What is with her? If someone mocked Kubballah I bet she would not be very happy.
2006-10-06 02:31:19 · 20 answers · asked by vegas_sizzle 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Something that confuses me is that people get all worked up about someone putting down Islam (Danish newspapers anybody?) or other religions, but suddenly someone is upset about people once again putting down Christians and people are laize-faire. If you think it is okay for one religion to get upset and not another, then that is in and of itself a type of persecution.
2006-10-06 02:55:58 · update #1
You can call a lot of things artistic, but saying it does not make it so. I personally think she has nothing left to shock the world with except this. There are better ways to explain persecution. I would be unimpressed with a swastika as a Jewish "artistic symbol" of persecution. It is ridiculous and trite.
2006-10-06 03:00:38 · update #2
I think she is a hypocrite.
Wrote a children's book touting tolerance...says she practices Kubballah which also touts tolerance and mutual understanding. Then, she mocks Christianity.
2006-10-06 02:35:51 · answer #1 · answered by Robert 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Could Madonna do anything now that really gets people rioting - hasn't she shocked everyone to death yet??? She did this in the 80s - how could she cause controversy now?
Madonna is trying to dismantle the hold that Christianity (esp Catholicism) has over the world. Her new religion has allowed her to peak behind the veil so to speak. Nice try - but again she wasted her shock value on this in the 80s.
2006-10-06 02:43:18 · answer #2 · answered by Applecore782 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You call it mocking a religion. Did you actually see it and read what she was saying? Or are you jsut seeing someone on a cross and immediately assume she's making fun of something?
The reason she did is is as an artistic statement about being persicuted, NOT as a dig towards christianity! Stop assuming and learn what someone is trying to say before forming a mob.
2006-10-06 02:41:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
First off, I don't think she's mocking 'him', I think it's a publicity stunt... also, who cares? If you say she's mocking him then everyone who wears a gold pendant (or made of anything else for that matter)on their chain is mocking christ... By the way, there is no such thing as Jesus Christ-if there is, it was just a book anyway... stop believing in something that amounts to a fairy tale!!!!!!!!
2006-10-06 04:31:26 · answer #4 · answered by winterdamsel 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope.
Non-christian symbols get mocked all the time in movies and music. Look at Eddie Murphy's The Golden Child or any movie with a Hindu cab driver playing religious music in his cab.
The worlds mocks us all, regardless of religion. No use getting all bent out of shape and trying to pull the whole "woe is us" crap.
2006-10-06 02:42:44 · answer #5 · answered by William B 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hulo controversy sells and Madonna knows that its all about getting attention and getting millions i bet lots of people will be curous about her concert jus coz of her mocking JC.It is sad but thats showbiz 4 u
2006-10-06 02:42:00 · answer #6 · answered by kags 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She wouldn't be happy about it, but she'd understand. She has a commercial marketing mind. Trust me, if Kubballah had a marketable diorama as widely known as the iconic one of Jesus on the cross, she'd add it to her act in a heartbeat and claim it was part of her faith to do so.
Keep in mind that she feels that Jesus and Christians should feel well flattered by the fact that she chose him for her act.
2006-10-06 02:37:36 · answer #7 · answered by nora22000 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
some factors of the Bible say who wrote those factors, some factors of the Bible seem 'nameless' yet have none the fewer been time-honored by using the Early Church as being good Scripture, 'useful for coaching and helping people and for correcting them and exhibiting them a thank you to stay'. that's what Paul wrote to Timothy, and then he suggested the Scriptures 'practice God's servants to do all kinds of excellent deeds'. i think of it is very diverse from the belief you have relating to the Bible being written by using 'cruel and evil Greeks and Romans'. are you able to call any of the Greeks and Romans you're questioning of? (you're able to do it as an Edit of the question or once you're making your very final remark after choosing a superb answer.) you're precise that some Greeks (alongside with Luke) and Romans (alongside with Paul) contributed to the Bible, yet i do no longer think of any of them did 'homicide any who did no longer trust their concept'. could you cite any good source for what you have alledged? i seem forward to listening to from you -- I savor the quest for certainty!
2016-10-18 22:13:39 · answer #8 · answered by genthner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that Madonna is a phony anyway. She's like 100 trying to be 20 and I think that she does it just for the controversy. Just be happy knowing that she'll have to answer for her actions one day.
2006-10-06 02:47:33 · answer #9 · answered by Jayna 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dont sweat it. The moon is not mocked when barked at by a dog.
2006-10-06 02:33:31 · answer #10 · answered by dragonrider707 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋