Provide an experimental design to determine whether the manufacturer's claim is valid for the following topic

Question

A fuel additive is claimed to result in significantly higher mileage in gasoline burning vehicles, if used at a dosage rate of 1 unit per 40L of gasoline.

Design should include:
A list of equipment and consumables.
Measures and precautions to be taken before during and after project to ensure valid statistical conclusions can be drawn.
Statistical treatment of data explaing rationale for choice.

ANY ASSISTANCE WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED

Answer 1

You either need (from best to worst):
a test engine with dynamometer
2 vehicles, as close to identical as possible, or
1 vehicle

How you design the procedures depends on which of these you have. If engine-dynamometer, make runs with and without additive. If 2 vehicles, first compare mileage of the two without additive, both driven in the same conditions (round trip to eliminate effects of steady wind), avoiding drafting from each other or any other vehicles. Then repeat the comparison with one vehicle using the additive and the other not (the control). If 1 vehicle, make runs with and without additive, trying to keep conditions as nearly identical as possible. Several repetitions of the test would reduce statistical error.
The answers to the specific requirements in your list also depend on your test equipment and require too detailed answers for this answer.

Answer 2

I won't attack evolution, yet i'm going to declare that if identity isn't technological know-how, neither is evolution. however the 1st think of you will desire to alter on your recommendations is that identity is creationism. they are completely countless issues. they might agree on some factors, yet they don't seem to be the comparable. identity is technological know-how, and makes use of the clinical approach. of direction, evolution believers do the comparable element you declare identity proponents do. no be counted what they see, it consistently looks evolution inflicting it. They on no account say that evolution could not do this, it somewhat is in basic terms consistently assumed. in case you decide on a competent e book on why identity is technological know-how, study the only indexed under. Please do not tell me you will not because of the fact the author lies, as i'm able to declare the comparable element appropriate to the authors you have faith. in case you somewhat need to appreciate what identity is all approximately, and why evolution won't be in a position to withstand the comparable scrutiny, study the e book. additionally, identity does not attack something. it somewhat is in basic terms searching for layout in nature. It has not something to do with faith or introduction, even though it has an analogous opinion that a writer would desire to be obtainable. although, it has no concept who the writer is. it somewhat is in basic terms as valid a technological know-how as forensics, opposite engineering, SETI and cryptology. the sole distinction is they are utilising the technological know-how to biology, which makes some people uncomfortable. in basic terms considering you do not purely like the achievable implications of something, does not make it non-technological know-how. Evolution additionally has metaphysical implications, yet no one seems to have a situation with that. i won't be in a position to do the query justice in this small area, however the e book i discussed provides you a extra comprehensive answer. thank you for the considerate query. Oh, and each time you pay attention somebody announcing something derogatory approximately identity, in basic terms stick to that to evolution, and you will see why it somewhat is in basic terms projection.