info . is the key to making the choice-i all i have been hearing is politcal b.s does anybody hear anything different? i like both of them but who would be better for texas?
2006-10-06 02:14:40 · 6 answers · asked by silvermane357 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Kinky is by far the better choice. Strayhorn is untrustworthy and comes off shady. She has lukewarm policies on almost everything, Kinky is steadfast in his views and unafraid to express his opinion whether its popular or not. I have a lot of respect for him.
2006-10-07 10:12:58 · answer #1 · answered by Paige 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kinky.
Why the hell not?
Okay, Strayhorn hits the buzzword issues, but Kinky has a much broader view of Texas and what the great Lone Star state needs.
He is more in touch with the average bubba than grandma Carole.
2006-10-06 07:05:15 · answer #2 · answered by docscholl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kinky
2006-10-09 12:31:34 · answer #3 · answered by George K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kinky Friedman because I believe he will do the things he says he will do, especially with securing our border with Mexico.
2006-10-08 14:30:05 · answer #4 · answered by scifiman2078 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in my opinion kinky would not just caus of the marijuana thing but because he seems to be a candidate more geared to focus on public opinion particularly that of college students which i am one of. hes steered alot of attention tword the younger generation of voters who deserve to be represented just as equally as older people
2006-10-06 02:27:12 · answer #5 · answered by Dre 5000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think kinky is going to have a good chance of winning
2006-10-06 02:22:25 · answer #6 · answered by kristi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋