I watched Fox News and the Hastert press conference and I'm appaulded at the Democrats for being behind the Foley gay thing with the Pages.
2006-10-06 01:43:29 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wrong.
First mistake was to watch it on Fox, and then listen to their lies afterward.
It has nothing to do with Foley being gay.
It has everything to do with Foley's sexually explicit IMs to underage interns.
Pelosi had nothing to do with Foley's attraction to children.
2006-10-06 01:48:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
The Democrats had nothing to do with the sex scandal, Foley did. I am appaulded (appalled) at your spelling.
2006-10-06 01:52:53 · answer #2 · answered by courage 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maxine Waters could be hillarious, she is batcrap loopy, could besides % Michelle Bachman (R) MN, I wager those too flow to the bars in DC mutually. yet heavily, i do no longer think of Pelosi could step down, even nonetheless as a democrat, i choose her too and it has no longer something to do with any CIA briefing. i comprehend Murtha replaced right into a generic posibility while she replaced into elected, yet he's been quiet in view that. i could desire to work out somebody like Ron form of Wisconsin get it. he's youthful, yet extremely smart and pushed. or perhaps Pomeroy of North Dakota I additionally like Adam Smith, WA and Robert Wexler FL. long photos, yet my 2 cents. See the subject is that the republicans have pent up rage, yet lack the numbers, they're scuffling with to maintain Franken out in MN, yet which will subside quickly in the event that they choose a brilliant gamble to win the different fights, so as that they actually could elect their battles or loose all of them. Do they desire to maintain Franken out, and enable Pelosi stay? Do they desire to combat well-being care reform or do they desire to convey the religious precise back into the blend and combat whoever Obama nominates to the final courtroom? they could't win all of them, they only don't have the numbers. My money is on the final courtroom combat. They make rather some noise and Obama seems to offer in an appoints a reasonable, republicans declare victory then years later call the nominee a liberal besides because of the fact she does not ingredient with the main remarkable wing nutjobs.
2016-10-18 22:10:48 · answer #3 · answered by lindgren 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How exactly did she force Foley? Did she put a gun to his head and force him to send emails and IM's? You're taking the word of a politician who is trying to cover his own political a** and a "news" network that has been the mouth piece for the republican party for 10 years.
I thought republicans believed in personal responsibility?
2006-10-06 02:10:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do repuglicans not place the blame exactly where it belongs instead of spinning a tall tail to blame somebody else, Foley did the deed and the speaker covered it up. period.
2006-10-06 01:49:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure, if you mean expose that Foley was a Pedophile, then why should she stand down. If you want to Justify the act and the cover-up, then your ethics and values are no better than dirt.
2006-10-06 01:46:07 · answer #6 · answered by Enterrador 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nancy Pelosi should step down for being an hypocrite.
Watch her pop her eyes. A sure sign of insanity.
2006-10-06 01:49:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nancy Pelosi is behind all the Dem perverts in Congress. She should have been gone a long time ago.
2006-10-06 02:02:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Democrats had nothing to do with the Foley sex scandal.
Hastert, by his inaction, blew away the Republicans reelection chances.
2006-10-06 01:45:53 · answer #9 · answered by Villain 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
What the diskins are you thinking, or can you think.
Easy 2
2006-10-06 01:49:23 · answer #10 · answered by wmf936 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋