English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

depends on what is the crime & how it has been shielded by patriotism

2006-10-06 01:42:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Depends on the circumstances under which the crime committed.
It also depends on the person who judges the action.

The action of the Army in J&K is not a crime for the Indians, where as it is a crime for others.

2006-10-06 16:55:08 · answer #2 · answered by Electric 7 · 0 0

...then it's still a crime. A crime is a crime - it's objective. "Patriotism" is subjective - what one considers patriotic, another might consider unpatriotic.

You can't justify a crime by hiding under the cloak of "patriotism" any more than you can justify a crime by hiding under the cloak of "religion".

2006-10-06 02:06:54 · answer #3 · answered by captain2man 3 · 0 0

What is your question?
In the name of "patriotism" we went to war, and the Jihadists are attacking us. In the name of patriotism we took Guantanamo, and yelled at the world "you're either with us, or against us"...

2006-10-06 00:51:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Patriotism is about feeling proud about ur nation of origin... n not killing or hurting someone....

It is like respecting ur parents. Would u commit a crim agains anothers parents if u love ur own....?

2006-10-06 01:37:56 · answer #5 · answered by BignTall 3 · 0 0

The term depends on which side you are. For the Indians, Afzal is a criminal. For Pak, he is Mujaheddin, a freedom fighter. The British considered Mahatma Gandhi as a criminal and for us, he is the father of the nation.

2006-10-06 00:46:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

A criminal can twist it as an act of patriotism

2006-10-06 02:11:48 · answer #7 · answered by indianborntowin 2 · 0 0

A crime is a crime no mater what other word you put with it.

2006-10-06 00:55:11 · answer #8 · answered by aiddogs5 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers