English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

if they can prve their tribal afflication? As they have been doing so for years.

2006-10-05 23:43:52 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

4 answers

Yes they should it is unfair that people who have a history of travel across man made borders have to cease their lawful activity because of a new keep the Mexican's out movement. None of the terrorists came in via Mexicao or Canada, but legally on visas!

2006-10-06 00:17:06 · answer #1 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 2 0

This replaced into asked until now. this is my answer back: this is basically my opinion however the single foreign places money should not be used because of the fact usa of america remains an self sufficient sovereign with a plenty better financial gadget than Canada and Mexico. in spite of what you assert relating to the yank financial gadget, there are nonetheless useful rules which could be utilized to it so it could maximum remarkable itself until now yet another super melancholy can ensue. yet another foreign places money won't be needed. it may ensue if the Mexican financial gadget fixes itself and brings it as much as par with usa of america. yet that may not ensue every time quickly with Mexico’s inner problems. perhaps Mexico can do it in two hundred years. Canada’s financial gadget can convey itself as much as par with usa of america in below 50 years.

2016-10-18 22:07:20 · answer #2 · answered by lindgren 4 · 0 0

In this world of ever growing concern over terrorists I see no reasons that anyone, regardless of ethnicity, should get a free pass when going through another country's borders. Being of American Indian dissent I see no harm whatsoever.

2006-10-05 23:58:20 · answer #3 · answered by anon_y_muse 2 · 1 0

More importantly, can you think of a reason they should not be allowed this??

2006-10-05 23:47:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers