English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Add the numbers:

Nineteen minus five =

4 + 3 x 2 =

6 - 5 =

Answer = 2106

I saw this puzzle on the mint on ITV1 last tuesday night (03 oct)
and they got the answer 2106, which turned out to be right, how can you get that high number from these numbers?

2006-10-05 22:23:34 · 14 answers · asked by sunset_bridge 2 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

14 answers

a) 19 - 5 = 14

b) 6 - 5 = 1

c) a - b = 14-1 = 13

d) 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 2 = 162 ( 4 number 3 x 2 !!)

c) 13 x 162 = 2106

2006-10-10 13:14:52 · answer #1 · answered by Daddybear 7 · 0 0

I understand the official answer was calculated like this.

19 + 5 + 14 (ie 19-5) =38

Treating the individual letters as roman numerals gives

1 (i) + 1000 (m) + 1 + 1 + 5 (v) = 1008

Now taking letter pairs,

1001 (mi) + 4 (iv) = 1005

They ignored the NINE but took the letters NET (ten backwards) so 10 was added.

The first line therefore gives 38 + 1008 + 1005 + 10 = 2061

Second line : 4 + 3 + 2 + 14 (the answer to the sum, although I would calculate this as 10) + 10 (for the x) = 33

Third line : 6 + 5 + 1 (the answer) = 12

Add them all up : 2061 + 33 + 12 = 2106

2006-10-06 02:14:33 · answer #2 · answered by tringyokel 6 · 1 0

I've looked at this for a while now and agree it is a joke. I doubt the Mint will release the answer willingly as if they do it will show how tenous and unwinnable a lot of their games are.

Think about the letter grid games they have where you need to place a letter in each of 4 horizontal words to form a vetical word downwards. There are probably about 500 different possiblities for words doing this and yet people keep on ringing in and the puzzle is rarely if ever solved.

It shows a lot about the mentality of the British public I guess....

2006-10-06 02:18:28 · answer #3 · answered by Robbo31 3 · 0 0

I think I got why the first numerals were 21.

Nineteen - 5= 14
4+3=7

14+7=21

Hmmm... 2+6=8-5=3 then I went back to the second equation and multiplied 3 by 2 which would make it 06.

This answer good enough?

2006-10-05 23:54:56 · answer #4 · answered by Marco A. J. 2 · 1 0

It's a mystery. That has been on the telly for weeks unsolved. I can't believe they didn't explain where 2106 came from!!!

I'm going to keep an eye on this post to see if anyone knows it. And I'll put a question to the mint as well. They have to explain, else they don't have a proper quiz and they will get into trouble.

2006-10-06 00:37:25 · answer #5 · answered by helen g 3 · 0 0

its one of those stupid ones where there are so many possibilities about which numbers to use. what you have to do is take each number mentioned as well as each sum given and add the totals. e.g. in the first line you have 19 - 5 which gives you both numbers and the sum, so you have: 19,5, 19-5, etc. you can probably also count the 'nine' part of 'nineteen' as a seperate number as well. the possibilities are almost endless, especially when you split a sum into different groupings. basically, it could be one of many answers. i can't say for sure how to work it out coz there are many ways of doing it but i'm sure its not too difficult.

2006-10-05 22:57:46 · answer #6 · answered by tsunamijon 4 · 1 0

19 - 5 = 14
4+3 * 2 = 10
6-5 = 1
I don't know multiplying is to low and 14 to the power of ten is to high

2006-10-06 07:30:38 · answer #7 · answered by nobody 2 · 0 0

As properly pronounced by skill of technique of others that's a scam it extremely works by skill of technique of you receiving a pretend cheque from which you grant a stability to the 'nanny' (non-existent!) the stability is generally sent by skill of utilising an digital skill (Moneygram / Western Union) - those procedures are speedy and paperless and as straight away simply by fact the bypass is accrued the scammer can vanish. This scam is a 'short con' - the scammers working it are in easy words attracted to making a speedy scam and vanishing - they do no longer in many situations have the capacity / components for something greater desirable in touch alongside with identity theft. As you have given out your take care of, the scammer could desire to possibly grant a cheque to you - if one arrives, you're arranged to take it and each and all of the emails with regards to to it on your nearest FBI place of artwork - they are going to pay interest to what to do with it as this style of scam is all too hassle-free remember, you have finished no longer something incorrect. If a cheque is sent, the scammer could desire to possibly attempt to rigidity you into cashing it - any emails from him could desire to be ignored & deleted. If he emails/telephones you and gets extremely undesirable tempered, remember he's the criminal , no longer you - any threats he could make (in many situations they threaten to call indoors the FBI!) are empty and powerless. I extremely have over 20 fakeys on my lounge wall and function won quite some "exciting' emails from scammers and that i'm despite the fact that respiratory ! This scammer is basically approximately particularly distant places places and former the capacity to do something greater desirable valuable than digital mail / telephone you. in case you haven't any longer won something indoors right here couple of weeks, then you definately won't get carry of something in any admire. desire this helps success!

2016-12-13 03:07:47 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

iv seen loads of these kinds on tv quiz shows. i think you work out the calculations and add the answers of them to all the numbers in the questions. try it an see if it works.
also add any hidden numbers as well.

2006-10-05 22:27:44 · answer #9 · answered by Robert A 3 · 0 0

Those programmes irritate me. They ask questions like "What colour is black?" and then you get people on the phones saying "Orange", "Mauve", "436", "The Pope" etc etc...until someone finally rings up and says "Coldplay" and the alarms go off and the person wins £3000. WHAT THE??!!!

Can't stand them, can't stand them, can't stand them...oooh I'm getting wound up just thinking about them....aaargghhh!!!

And don't even get me started on those irritating presenters!! AAaaarrgghhh!!!

2006-10-05 22:28:57 · answer #10 · answered by gromitski 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers