2006-10-05 20:43:00 · 6 answers · asked by abhishek j 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
UMPIRE IS DERRYL HAIR NOT INZAMAM.
2006-10-06 02:26:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Actually punishment was not decided by ICC. THe punishment was awarded by ICC as per the recommendation of the Adjudicator, Mr. Ranjan Madugale as Inzamam was found guilty of disrupting the game by not taking the field and not ball tampering. I feel to be fair an enquiry against Umpire should have been conducted.
2006-10-05 21:55:01 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ICC has done the right thing according to the rule, there is a thought that Inzi was charged for being an Asian more , on other hand Darell hair should be banned for life.
2006-10-05 20:54:17 · answer #3 · answered by Talha R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-10-06 02:43:50 · answer #4 · answered by Varun 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ooops, your question is wrong.
2006-10-06 10:23:00 · answer #5 · answered by chunnu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-10-05 20:46:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋