When you say "the search for food", I'm thinking in the lines of cave dwelling men who actually hunt for their own food. The quality of food affects humans a lot but that is more on the biologically (haha, look at the fast food industry @_@). Socially, the search for food probably led them to group huntings but those are only a small part of the society though still very important.
On the contrary, sex as we all know it get people to act in more crazy ways than one. They dressed and acted in ways to attract the person whom they want to have sex with. But did this contribute a lot to society's development? Maybe only in the lines of the powerful marrying the more powerful and things like that.
So to answer the question to which one has a greater effect, it is hard to say without any basis. I think it probably is sex because the interaction affects more people. While everybody eats, not everybody searches for food but we are all biologically driven to propegate I mean ermm.. have sex.
*whew, that took some time to answer... >_<*
2006-10-05 20:59:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lea 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Our strongest instincts are for water, survival and sex. Without these the human race would have died out years ago, food is important but we can live without it for a certain amount of time.
2006-10-05 22:00:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by livachic2005 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Food.
2006-10-08 13:57:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm in simple terms examining a e book that states that the full progression of intelligence and civilization develop into pushed through sexual alternatives more suitable than survival. even as human beings listen "survival of the fittest" they imagine in elementary words of diversifications that help you reside to inform the tale, even with the indisputable fact that that's truly 2 elements: the diversifications that help you reside to inform the tale AND diversifications that help you procreate. as an social gathering huge teeth help you reside to inform the tale, yet heaving an exceedingly colourful tail (in case of a peacock) helps you detect a sexual significant different and bypass on your genes. in accordance to that e book, our intelligence and the present of speach did not truly help us in surviving till 10.000 years after it developed, so survival couldn't be the driving rigidity - it develop into fairly an unpredicted results of a few thing that develop into developed as technique of competing sexually.
2016-12-04 08:05:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
actually it was the wheel, so you can have sex while searching for food
2006-10-05 21:18:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by jon 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
food..sex just made more people.which then needed more food...then more folks wanted sex for a reward for finding more food.....which..made more people....both are equal.
2006-10-07 13:05:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both are natural instincts so I guess they're both equal, we couldn't survive without either of them.
2006-10-05 20:32:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by island_laddie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋