English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The world has said many of times that Iran is allowed nuclear energy but will only accept it if it another country enriches the uranium for them. If Iran's nuclear ambitions really are for peaceful purposes then why won't they agree to this? Are they hiding something?

When is the world going to realize that talk is cheap, diplomacy is obviously not working here and it's time to enforce sanctions?

2006-10-05 19:42:37 · 8 answers · asked by SGT 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

8 answers

Not if we depend on the UN (Useless Nuisance) to do something. Bush had to take the US to war with Saddam Insane to finally enforce years of toothless UN resolutions. And look at the thanks he gets for it. The chickensh*t UN won't and can't do squat to Iran or any other stubborn nation. Too many UN members are too cozy with the mullahs and their black gold to let anyone shake the tree beyond a 'strongly worded protest'. Oh dear!! Do you think they will write us another nastygram tomorrow!! How WILL we bear the shame!?!?

2006-10-05 19:56:52 · answer #1 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 2 0

Iran is right not to let other countries enrich the uranium; it would make her dependent. Of course, it is obvious they want nuclear weapons too (otherwise they would let in the inspectors check the plants), but not much can be done.

Iran is already suffering from sanctions a long time ago, it doesn't help.
Force can't be used because there is no available force, and China and Russia wouldn't support it anyway, because Iran is a very important partner for them in energy matters.

If things get worse, I guess there will be some airsrtikes on the power plants, that's all.

2006-10-05 19:57:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have performed matters in defiance, however have not ever suggested a query. I have had my questions suggested and understand how it feels. I real hate the oppressive approaches of Yahoo Answers. :) Oh and likewise I constantly attraction my query's elimination and feature gained frequently, appeals do paintings!

2016-08-29 07:06:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You are absolutely correct! They will talk this matter to death and Iran will have a nuke. No more talking. sanction the bastards and if this does not work then the next step is to hit them hard. N. Korea is next.

2006-10-05 20:30:06 · answer #4 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 0 0

iran has successfully tied their nuclear program to their national honor ... in this regard, it gives the current regime legitamacy and to back down would doom the regime ... but as far as them being "defiant" ... what if china told the US to disarm all nuclear weapons or they would cause a worldwide sanction and blockade of all goods to the US and back it up with promise of full scale nuclear launch on the US if we do not comply? .. how would that make YOU feel? you would be like "*** you, bring it on" right?

2006-10-05 20:01:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I would hope something is done before it is to late I believe we should strike first Iran France North Korea and Russia and China they can't hurt us if they are all dead and I think if we strike first no could stop us

2006-10-05 20:01:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

think they need to see this through their own laws and ethics .seems they're blind from being told .lol.

2006-10-05 19:57:24 · answer #7 · answered by martinmm 7 · 0 0

Not until it's to late.

2006-10-05 20:44:47 · answer #8 · answered by .45 Peacemaker 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers