I'm tired of seeing democrats getting off on this but still loving Clinton.
2006-10-05 18:15:42 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
kris I agree, and to others you would still defend Clinton even if she was 16.
2006-10-05 18:20:27 · update #1
Check this out .http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/BrianRoss/story?id=2509586&page=1
2006-10-05 18:20:00 · answer #1 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I won't defend either.
And the Mark Foley (you discredit yourself by not even bothering to get the name right) case shouldn't even be a political issue.
As to Clinton that matter should have been and stayed a personal issue between Clinton and his wife (who he was cheating on). It should have never been dragged out into the public like it was. Did Clinton lie? Of course he did. Most cheating husbands do. But still, it should have stayed a personal matter between those three.
For years Ike had a long-term mistress. Back them it was understood to be a matter between Mamie and Ike to deal with and at least the Democrats had the good graces not to drag it out in the open. Republicans went after Clinton because he was a very popular, very effective president.
Mark Foley, on the other hand, went after underage boys. Totally illegal and equally immoral. There simply is no comparison between the two.
2006-10-06 01:52:00 · answer #2 · answered by Doc Watson 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion if you bashed Clinton and the democrats for Monicagate you should take it like a man when Foley and the Gay Old Perverts get bashed. Agree?
2006-10-06 01:18:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hmmm, that's an interesting comparison. Although I really don't see how you've managed to convince yourself that what Foley did is the same as what Clinton did. I didn't like what Clinton did with Monica but it wasn't nearly as creepy as what Foley has been up to.
2006-10-06 01:26:25 · answer #4 · answered by fifa575 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Marvelous. Another totally ignorant question from another totally ignorant conservative.
Pay attention, Bozo.
TOM Foley is a former congressman.
MARK Foley is the conservative Republican pedophile sex criminal who had the Republican "leadership" cover up his crimes.
Bill Clinton had consensual sex with another adult. But he lied about it. Shouldn't have, but he did.
The Republican congress had a hissyfit over that and spent years and many millions of taxpayer dollars investigating something nobody except other Republicans cared about.
Meanwhile, Bush lies about IRAQ, WMD's etc., gets almost 3000 soldiers killed and 20,000 seriously wounded.
Does the Republican congress investigate him?
Do Republicans propose the impeachment Bush so richly deserves?
No, they find ways to try and blame the MARK Foley (R-Fla.) sex scandal on Clinton & the Democrats.
Thoroughly disgusting and typically Republican.
2006-10-06 01:30:37 · answer #5 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Who's Tom Foley?
2006-10-06 01:21:39 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Listen pal, were you as victim of child abuse? Well I was. And I dont care what party a pedophile belongs to. This disgusting vile crap goes way beyond politics. And please don't give me that they would defend Monica if she 16. What Foley did was wrong, and what Hastert did was despicable. And no I don't rub it in or make stupid comments like Matt Drudge did.
2006-10-06 01:56:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Clinton lied to a Grand Jury. Foley resigned. Bad comparison.
2006-10-06 01:32:47 · answer #8 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The party of family values and you guys don't know the difference between consensual adult sex and pedophilia.
That explains your obsession with other peoples sex lives,. However, it does not explain your fascination with Clinton's penis. Why do conservatives spend so much time thinking about Clinton's unit?
It seems just a little gay to me, but that's your business.
2006-10-06 01:36:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
No.
And no I wouldn't defend Clinton if Monica were underaged. She was 22. More than an adult. It was wrong of him - very wrong.
But nowhere near as wrong as sharing sexual contact with a minor.
Sorry, but that's the fact, and that's the law.
2006-10-06 01:31:01 · answer #10 · answered by WBrian_28 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋