http://www.carm.org/evolution.htm
2006-10-05 18:01:47 · 8 answers · asked by chained6002 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
Hi. No. I read the 'Noah's Ark' chapter first. You MUST understand that the inability to prove something does not DISprove it.
2006-10-05 18:05:45 · answer #1 · answered by Cirric 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Looking through some of this, it's very obviously misinformed. But interesting to peak through and digest. Here are just two points that bothered me:
"Neanderthal Man" was not human at all. We've looked at their DNA. Not human, did not even contribute genetic data to modern Homo sapiens.
Carbon dating is VERY rarely used as an exclusive dating method for any substance. It's quite curious that this article is willing to accept dates only for as old as the Bible allows the earth to be.
I won't argue the rest because any response from the author is begging the question, and because we do not share the same beliefs it's not fair for me to assume that I could change someone else's mind.
Maybe the "questioner" should consider that point as well.
2006-10-06 07:23:18 · answer #2 · answered by sun of samsa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just spent some time looking through that site. I read a few pages. And no - it does not change my perspective at all. I can refute pretty much everything I've read on that site so far. Whoever contributes to that site really has no true understanding of science at all.
2006-10-05 18:12:36 · answer #3 · answered by Kleineganz 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This Yahoo! Answers category is devoted to science.
Religious theories belong in the Home > Society & Culture > Religion & Spirituality category.
Thanks,
Deep Thought
2006-10-05 18:08:10 · answer #4 · answered by Deep Thought 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO!
I love the Religious Babble that all religions spew forth as if they knew anything at all about the "Real" world around us.
Religious Babble will rot your brain.
Go ahead, knock yourself out with all the Religious NONSENSE if you like, I prefer to be an objective observer not a rote biblical monkey.
To each his own........... You can wait for "Manna" from heaven... I prefer to plant my fields and reap my harvest.......please and thank you 8-)
2006-10-05 18:07:26 · answer #5 · answered by TommyTrouble 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes it does.
I used to think that Creationists had morals. Seeing the reasoning that improbable equals impossible, and seeing the fallacious reasoning they use to try to attack science for purely political purposes, I am convinced otherwise.
The fact that they create terms to fling as insults, such as "Evolutionist" only reinforces the impression.
2006-10-05 18:15:18 · answer #6 · answered by novangelis 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
These are the same old fanciful arguments that have been going around for years. They are full of holes and prove nothing.
2006-10-05 18:09:54 · answer #7 · answered by October 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Umm...no. Why should it? I glimpsed through a few things and it looks to me like it's just another Christian parroting site.
2006-10-05 18:12:44 · answer #8 · answered by Qchan05 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋