Everyone knows about Baldwin, Franks and Kolbe right?
Is homosexuality incompatible with congress?
If Franks really has a list is it in the same format the Nazis used to list the Jews?
If the rest get outed will it damage the democrats more tha the republicans.
Is this really something to be concerned about?
2006-10-05 17:15:03 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I just find it funny that right before a midterm this comes out. The democrats are trying to have everyone fired (that is republican). Yet at the same time when Stubbs (Democrat) was censured for taking a 16 yr old page to the Bahamas for sex he was applauded (standing ovation) by the Democrats. If someone is gay, so what? If they break the law by having relations with minors they should go to jail and be on the sexual predator list like everyone else that gets caught. No matter what party.
2006-10-05 17:23:42 · answer #1 · answered by mikis1967 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The biggest danger to our country and our democracy is George W. Bush and the right wing Congress who goes along with everything he does.
It doesn't matter who's gay, and the Republicans are ruining people's lives by exposing gay people who want their personal lives kept private.
The problem was with one particular pedophile, not with gay people. His gayness is irrelevant. What is relevant is that the Republican House leadership was aware of the problem with Mark Foley for many years and did everything they could to prevent it from being exposed, ignoring complaints from numerous pages.
This is just one more clear example of how our far-right leaders are not only wrong on politics, but failures as human beings and parasites on our society who need to be removed from office and perhaps jailed for covering up crimes.
Mark Foley probably belongs in prison for what he did, but so does Hastert and the others for covering this up and knowingly exposing children to this predator.
2006-10-05 17:54:38 · answer #2 · answered by Alan S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In 1960 clowns such as you unfavorable John Kennedy through fact as a Catholic he may be taking direct orders from the Vatican. i think of the socialism that Barack Hussein Obama espouses, and has effectively greater over the final 3 a million/2 years to be a plenty extra suitable risk to our freedom than the non-public non secular ideals of Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan.
2016-12-08 09:19:22 · answer #3 · answered by trip 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe Congress needs to adopt the military stance on homosexuality?
It's pretty sad when a person's legal and consensual sex preferences become more important than their contributions and accomplishments.
2006-10-05 17:22:31 · answer #4 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No but Congress needs to clean house
2006-10-05 17:20:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
you are way of track,there is only one Danger to humanity,and that is the rh negative illuminati blood line
check blood lines of the illuminati by David Icke,on www.infowars,you will be very suprised who belongs to that.
2006-10-05 17:21:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Our own president, George W. Bush. Enough said!
2006-10-05 17:25:48 · answer #7 · answered by brian 2010 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Democratic Party and their warped and twisted ideology and lack of morals are a clear and present danger!
2006-10-05 17:25:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
You asked who else represents a danger. THIS secret and evil group does!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
and so does Bush for THESE secret and evil, future plans!...
http://www.global-conspiracies.com/fema_concentration_camps.htm
http://www.gnn.tv/threads/9229/FEMA_DEATHCAMPS_AND_THE_RED_AND_BLUE_LIST_UNDER_MARTIAL_LAW
http://www.thepowerhour.com/news2/ftct.htm
2006-10-06 06:05:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You got me ? I'm lost. Who knows ? Maybe you or I are the danger ?! :)
2006-10-05 17:17:59 · answer #10 · answered by tysavage2001 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋