English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i mean isnt that sorta hipacrital the united states has the most nukes in the world matching russia. and then when another country wants some they go after them.

2006-10-05 17:10:54 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

18 answers

Um lets think about it.
We won't use them.
They will.
Have I made it clear enough for you?

2006-10-05 17:12:38 · answer #1 · answered by chupakabra123 5 · 1 0

Geeeeee I don't know, maybe it is because the president of Iran has already stated that Israel will be wiped from the face of the earth and the leader of N Korean thinks nothing of killing his own people so we know that he would never use them on another country. Letting those two countries have nukes is kind of like giving a person with limited mental capacity a bomb and telling him to play nice. I think Iran and N Korea should have nukes under the understanding that if they ever use them in an agressive manor (how else would you use one?) they will be wiped from the face of the earth.

2006-10-05 17:19:00 · answer #2 · answered by JMidd 2 · 1 0

Tim are you sure we literally have 20 thousand. Anyhow, even if that is the number I think you need to familiarize yourself with the term "deterrent force". Iran and NoKo wants nuclear weapons so they can launch against other nations, so unless youre interested in seeing a worldwide nuclear conflict I'd suggest you stfu. I could care either way so I'll go along with what everyone else says.

2006-10-05 17:16:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Ah,but North Korea has a power hungry dictator with a desire to invade South Korea and bring it all under his control. Iran has religious clerics running the country and would like nuclear power as a weapon in the name of Islam. Here in the U.S. we have several agencies who control who has access to those weapons.

2006-10-05 17:16:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

because iran and korea have made no secret that they wish to use it on the unite states as well as some neiboring countrys
they have threatend the us in nice political words you would know this if you read a paper as well as the news casts and other political segments try the chat rooms see what answer you get under the politics room

2006-10-05 17:14:10 · answer #5 · answered by sailor 2 · 1 0

The fact is that the United States' economy is heavily dependent on military spending. Guess what kind of weapons make a bunch of fancy toys obsolete?

2006-10-05 17:14:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

its rather obvious. if other countries have nukes and they don't agree with the American forceful tactics of following their policy with regards to their own country, this country (Korea for example) could feel threatened and could attack the us with the nukes.

the US is too cowardly to let someone else have any power. they want to rule the world and all its resources.

2006-10-05 17:20:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, of course, and we also test these nuclear missiles and weapons too, but no one else can. A firm "secret" message was apparently given to N. Korea about testing their nukes but the administration is divided about what to do about it.

2006-10-05 17:18:07 · answer #8 · answered by To Be 4 · 1 0

Heck yes, tim! Let's just let every turd world country that hates our guts have weapons that can be smuggled in suitcases and blow up entire cities. That will certainly help me sleep better at night. Especially when I watch the big monster 'Death to America" rallies. Shame on us all for being so selfish!!

2006-10-05 17:18:30 · answer #9 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 1 0

The US has the mental capacity and civility to control the use of our arms. Were not about to sell them to terrorists for profit. Not intentionally anyway.
I say that because under FDR the Rosenburgs were able to get their hands on classified military secrets and get them to their Communist Comrads.
I guess Demoncrats efforts towards National Security hasn't changed much after all.

2006-10-05 17:21:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It's because of George W Bush!! Nah, they're just trying to be top dog and believe that they are the only country that should have "priveledges" such as these and they are the only ones who can use them responsibly!

2006-10-05 17:19:01 · answer #11 · answered by moroaero 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers