and this is no mistake........this is deliberate and proof Faux news is worthless, and so are its viewers
the link clearly shows a screenshot from oreillys show......pathetic
http://www.democrats.com/node/10241
2006-10-05 16:44:20 · 10 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeah. It definitely happened. Whatever happened to the "No Spin Zone" crap?
Here's another link corroborating what you're saying:
http://www.newshounds.us/2006/10/03/fox_uses_subliminal_ploy_on_foley_head_shot.php
The motivation for such manipulation is quite clear: In this day and age of very close election results, every little bit counts ALOT.
Pidpit, you're a typical neocon with that attitude. He is pointing out something factual. Namecalling and wishful thinking doesn't alter reality.
2006-10-05 16:46:41 · answer #1 · answered by Candidus 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
OK - first off, thank you for the link, although I'd expected you to add it to your other question.
You reject the "mistake" theory out of hand, I presume for the same reason the author of the blog did? You do realize that, by that theory, no mistakes are ever made in any newspaper or on any new show, since all of them have editors and fact-checkers? Do you really think that's the way the world works?
More to the point, though, I'm wondering why you think they did it. Do you really think they were trying to convince people that he's a Democrat? Do you really think they would expect a deception like that to last longer than, oh, say, ten minutes?
2006-10-05 16:52:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Interesting. I guess the Republican party needs all the help it can get right now. I didn't think anyone really took Fox news seriously anymore.
2006-10-05 17:10:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Faux news?
Isn't everything on tv a lie?
2006-10-05 16:46:32 · answer #4 · answered by tantiemeg 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Please outline "sparkling skill". i understand that some evaluate wind turbines and image voltaic panels to be styles of "sparkling skill" yet quite they're some distance from "sparkling". even with each and every thing, they're both man made and that calls for massive quantities of skill. once maufactured the wind turbines and image voltaic panels should be transported to their vacation spot - regularly through large, diesel gas powered trucks. once on website they're erected through workers who rigidity to and from the paintings website in gas using trucks and autos. large diesel fueled cranes are required to hoist the wind turbine elements and image voltaic panels. Then there is the mandatory infrastructure required to connect the wind turbines and image voltaic panels to the electric powered grid. I doubt you keep in mind the talk over nuclear skill again in the late Nineteen Seventies, early Nineteen Eighties. After a truly minor concern at 3 Mile Island - the position a miniscule volume of radioactivity develop into truly released and there have been no suggested injuries - the media reacted as even with the actuality that a Hiroshima sized atomic bomb were dropped. for sure extremely-left liberals like "Hanoi" Jane Fonda and others jumped on the bandwagon. They were whipped right into a extra frenzy even as the Russian reactor at Chernobyl actually exploded via defective layout and operation, transforming into a real nuclear disaster. At that element in time nuclear skill in the U.S. develop into all yet complete. the actual shown actuality that Japan and France both generate about 70% of their electricity with nuclear skill is seldom suggested. Your so-said as "sparkling skill" is a delusion. continually has been, continually will be. To generate adequate electricity to skill this united states might want to require thousands of thousands of wind turbines stretching from sea to sea and an equivalent type of image voltaic panels - and we would want to nevertheless favor oil for transportation and as lubricant for the wind turbines. i ask your self what result an F5 tornado might want to have on a wind turbine "farm" in the midwest and how some ft of snow might want to result image voltaic panels in upstate ny....
2016-12-04 08:00:12 · answer #5 · answered by bednarz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that was O'Riley,, but he hasn't mentioned his faux news, the Internet video doesn't even show a banner at all,,, deception of the willful kind
2006-10-05 16:53:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Diane, Fox did it because they know that there is enough gullible fools out there who take there word as gospel and they will believe it.
2006-10-05 16:58:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
hey pidpit...
no i wont.......tune into Faux news, live in your pretend world..reality gonna bite yer @ss..and you cant pretend it wont
2006-10-05 16:56:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Shut yer piehole jerk.
Go back to your liberal MSM
2006-10-05 16:52:12 · answer #9 · answered by pidpit 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
As if they had credibility to start with ?
2006-10-05 16:46:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋