identifying foley as a dem is not only a lie, it's an act of desparation that exposes all viewers of Faux news as those who need to be told what they want to hear....sorry, foley is a rightwing scum,,,,like all the rest.
2006-10-05 16:31:49 · 15 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why do libs like to watch CNN( Clinton News Network) and all other liberal MSM?
Sorry, do you even watch FNC? I don't recall them mentioning that he was a dimocrap.
2006-10-05 16:34:55 · answer #1 · answered by pidpit 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
One would think that someone who is so analytical of the news agencies would be posting questions about how ABC let out the identity of the page IM'd by Foley, but let's not be non-partisan for a moment. Fox News did say D-Fl on it's photos according to some websites. I work for a living so don't get to watch Fox News non-stop and didn't catch it. I only watch Brit Hume on Fox anyways, who always said he was a Republican.
2006-10-05 16:40:51 · answer #2 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They say he's a dem? Man they really must be worried that this is going to screw up their grip on the religious right eh?
here's a link for ya:
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbeat/2006/10/fox_fixes_foley.html
O'Reilly Factor, the disgraced Republican congressman was labeled in an on-screen graphic as a Democrat (D-FL). "There were three instances... each cutaway about 15 seconds or more." Take that reality!
2006-10-05 16:42:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
This whole discussion is bogus.
Sexual predators are predators - plain and simple - it's not because they're Republicans or Democrats or any other political affiliation - it's because they have twisted and demented sexual preferences, period.
How dumb is it to equate Foley with all republicans: Let me show you -
Ted Kennedy is an alcoholic - Ted Kennedy is a democrat - hence all democrats are alcoholics.
See how dumb that logic is?
2006-10-05 16:54:43 · answer #4 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because of the fact the different networks are populated by speaking heads which could in basic terms say "Bush lied." How is that reporting the information? are not getting me incorrect, Fox additionally places a spin on it besides. even if befell to the media being trustworthy and impartial? i in my view can not watch the Communist New community. They make my blood boil. they seem to think of existence here could be extra suitable if the terrorists had taken over the U. S.. i could lots quite combat in some one elses outdoors than my very own. What approximately you? are you able to deny that we've been attacked? are you able to deny that Saddam never complied with the UN sanctions positioned on Iraq after he invaded Kuwait? are you able to deny that he killed hundreds of his very own human beings? What could the function of the U. S. be in a international have been we are the final final supper skill? pass away it to the chinese language? Please.....
2016-10-15 21:33:32 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no cheer leaders other than FOX. Sometimes the major networks and papers will side with BushCo., but nobody doe it better than FOX. They've got the loudmouths there like O'Lielly and Hannity--nice company to be in.
in_moes_honest_opinion, you hit the nail on the head! There was no excusing that mistake. I think FOX let that one slip for their gullible viewers.
2006-10-05 16:42:59 · answer #6 · answered by tiko 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I've been combing their website, and I see no evidence that they misrepresented his party at all, let alone deliberately. Sounds like you're trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill here.
Anyway, since we're on the subject, I thought the "October surprise", which is what this story looks more and more to be, was going to benefit Republicans. Isn't that what you left-wingers have been telling us all along?
2006-10-05 16:44:47 · answer #7 · answered by Chris S 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Umm... ok. You might google "included question" and "logic".
In any event - do you have a link for this? I hadn't heard that they'd called him a Democrat. If so, it was either a simple mistake or an incredibly lame attempt at a coverup, considering that pretty much every news show I've seen or heard (including Hannity) identified him as a Republican.
2006-10-05 16:34:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I've discovered that all network news is crap...Whats with the "Faux"...is that suppose to be all high and mighty...must be a fancy pants democrat...Vote Green Goof...
2006-10-05 16:36:04 · answer #9 · answered by loofa36 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There is no proof whatever at this time that Mark Foley is a pedophile or that he has sexually molested anyone but, even so, he has resigned. Probably he is a sick person, but your "question" clearly shows that you are just as bad.
2006-10-05 16:40:54 · answer #10 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
It's because fox is basically just advertising for republicans , they won't put almost anything that puts the republicans in a situation .
2006-10-05 16:40:42 · answer #11 · answered by kame 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋