2006-10-05 15:50:27 · 15 answers · asked by DeborahDel 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No. But I also don't think any of these "reasons" (excuses) are true. Even if they were, his actions are unacceptable and they don't really speak too well of his judgment, either.
2006-10-05 15:52:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I do not think he had intentions of that, but for a while having them there, became easy access to his cover up of being homosexual and the were just his target, because he knew how to lure them.
2006-10-05 15:53:43 · answer #2 · answered by cnhen2005 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He claims to have been molested by a priest so it's almost a wonder he did not become one since he was aware how easily they can victimize children.
2006-10-05 15:52:48 · answer #3 · answered by cathcoug 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a stretch....he would find access to young men wherever he was employed. It's what those pervs do.
2006-10-05 15:53:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows what makes people do what they do? I think he just like the power, and couldn't handle the pressure
2006-10-05 15:52:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unlikely. He would have been better off as a school teacher.
2006-10-05 15:51:44 · answer #6 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I think he looked at that as a fringe benifit.
2006-10-05 15:51:51 · answer #7 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he just took advantage of the situation available
2006-10-05 15:52:36 · answer #8 · answered by pinhed_1976 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't go that far, but I bet it was a teaser.
2006-10-05 15:53:23 · answer #9 · answered by glasgow girl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows his reasoning for what he does and/or did. All I know is that he is one sick puppy.
2006-10-05 15:54:31 · answer #10 · answered by diannas_love 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋