I only covered up for Mark Foley for three years.
2006-10-05 15:43:23 · 10 answers · asked by Where's the beef? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because you are a stubborn spineless republicon!
2006-10-05 15:53:30 · answer #1 · answered by X Man 99 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Probably because you're not really Hastert. I would say since you're impersonating him, he's got more integrity than you do. That's not saying much.
All I'm saying is that people who impersonate others have no integrity...which means that Hastert has next to none, IF he truly knew exactly what was going on with Foley.
You people are WAY too sensitive.
2006-10-05 22:46:00 · answer #2 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Libs have been covering up for Ted Kennedy and Clinton for years and what is your worthless point again? Oh just whining and crying Never mind
2006-10-05 22:55:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You haven't destroyed evidence over the past 6 years of the republicans crimes.
2006-10-05 22:45:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because then you wouldn't have access to the good gossip about teen exploitation in the House of Reps!!!
2006-10-05 22:45:13 · answer #5 · answered by knoxymama 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hastert will help the Republicans lose the election! He did nothing about a pervert.
2006-10-05 22:49:11 · answer #6 · answered by Villain 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because then all the young boys would rush to the Demofags.
2006-10-05 22:52:54 · answer #7 · answered by zahbudar 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You mean the cover-up that never happened?
2006-10-05 22:46:06 · answer #8 · answered by fat_american 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are an idiot or maybe a low functioning moron, all repuglicans are.
2006-10-05 22:49:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
We need you here to cover for the uther stuff...............
2006-10-05 22:48:25 · answer #10 · answered by Baby Shiraz 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋