my freinds girlfreind had a realationship . and his girl got on top of him and sperm inside her. he is worrired if he got her pregnant or not? please respond
2006-10-05 15:38:53 · 23 answers · asked by statetx76209 1 in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
Yes she can get pregnant.
2006-10-06 06:46:41 · answer #1 · answered by Scully 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Dude...she will get pregnant. Even if u had s*x upside down, she will still get pregnant. Position does not constitute to the fact but its actually the sperm. Good luck
2006-10-05 15:43:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
If the sperm was free inside he they can swim up hill. She could easily be prego. They have a day after pill for whoopsies.
2006-10-05 15:43:16 · answer #3 · answered by mss04 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow, talk about school funding issues, sperm swim up the river just like the salmon do!
2006-10-05 15:49:05 · answer #4 · answered by pink poodle 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes you can get her pregnant.
Gravity (unfortunately) has nothing to do with getting a woman pregnant or not. He's probably released pre-ejaculatory fluid (yes, it has sperm in it) even before he climaxed.
2006-10-05 16:20:27 · answer #5 · answered by drummer.luver 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First off, please either stay in school or stay in school till you can spell. Second I just had a baby and all we do is me on top, so your friend is just being ignorant. Get some condoms or he will bring a life into this world that wont be loved.
2006-10-05 19:33:36 · answer #6 · answered by jennifer b 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If the sperm is in her,most likely. How old are you to be asking such a question?
2006-10-05 15:43:23 · answer #7 · answered by mayvo 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't matter what position your in sperm will get a girl pregant regardless
2006-10-05 15:47:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes!
2006-10-05 15:46:49 · answer #9 · answered by Burford Bigelow 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be him getting pregnant would it not? Conventional sexual position puts women on bottom durinfg sex, and they're usually pregnant. So if you role reverse, everything else so be reversed too, wouldn't you think so?
2006-10-05 16:52:39 · answer #10 · answered by FILO 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋