perhaps PeeWee Herman or Al Gore?
2006-10-05 15:00:07 · 17 answers · asked by Jim 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
iswd nice answer.
2006-10-05 15:04:30 · update #1
George W. Bush. no, you're overqualified for the job. you qualify for democratically election deity.
2006-10-05 15:05:47 · update #2
I don't know, to be honest, but I think Hillary Clinton would vote for herself, and as things are looking now, she's probably going to be starting her climb towards this next election.
Nothing against a woman being presisdent, but cmon, that lady is as cold as you can get...
(Did you hear that Buddy, clintons dog, died? Yep, apparently he jumped up on Hillary's lap and froze to death.)
**Edit**
Thanks, apparently 3 people disagreed :P (Probably women! (ducks and hides) ow!)
2006-10-05 15:02:36 · answer #1 · answered by iswd1 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yes i am qualified for this position .I do not believe in killing for any reason .That criminals need to be seperated from the rest of society for all time .That every weapon created for killing needs to be destroyed and that anyone who makes a weapon should be set apart from society .That it is better to live a non violent life free from anger .That the pressure to be the best and win all the time is wrong .That the enjoyment is in the doing .Glorified competition for the sake of sport and gambling and profit which risks the lifes of those participating should come to an end .That sport is what one does for leisure and not for money . This has made it a brutle attempt to earn a living at the cost of lifes ruined with steroid abuse and use that harms the user but profits the team owners .
If you had the choice of sticking a needle in your arm or digging a ditch it is not hard to see why people do what they feel they must to compete .
We must accept that we all live on the same planet an if i poison my water supply with chemicals i harm everyone on the planet so all harmfull chemicals that man has made must be carefully disposed of and alternatives found ..
There was a time not to long ago that you could drink from rivers and streams and spring feed lakes .Only mans ignorance and misuse of his enviroment spread plagues and death .
We need to carefully manage the earth as a bio-sphere that it is and cutting down the oxygen creating rainforests is bad for everyone on the planet .Burning tens of thousands of acres does not make sense .Carefull harvest of productive farm land is much better then clear cut and burn which adds tons of carbon to our air .
I actually care about the world and all the people in it and feel truly able to mediate an acceptable understanding among all people .
2006-10-05 22:31:30 · answer #2 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Needs to be smart, but not too smart
Compassionate, but not too compassionate.
Needs to be respectable, but not idolized.
Charisma would be nice, but not required.
They should have to be drafted into the job, not actively campaigned for it.
Most of the people most qualified would not touch the job with a ten foot pole.
How about Warren Buffet or Bill Gates?
2006-10-05 22:09:01 · answer #3 · answered by aka DarthDad 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Before finding the rulers for the World I think we should look for some qualified people for Iraq.
2006-10-05 22:14:48 · answer #4 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
George Bush thinks he is qualified for that job, he's trying to do it every day!!!!!
2006-10-05 22:07:53 · answer #5 · answered by Joy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, but I liked the idea of Robin Williams for president. He couldn't do any worse than bush.
2006-10-05 22:03:46 · answer #6 · answered by shermynewstart 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bill Clinton or Jimmy Carter, both are respected around the world.
2006-10-05 22:02:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I think I am and so far I have a following of one. My mom.
2006-10-05 22:03:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bugs Bunny ?
2006-10-05 22:02:43 · answer #9 · answered by hardartsystems 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oprah or Hillary!!!!! Together they could rule the world.
2006-10-05 22:02:46 · answer #10 · answered by quickspend 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋