It came to light long ago that the pics taken by Nasa, primarily for geological purposes, used false colour images, apparently for more details of rock formations and the like. The more true colour pics have not been so widely published. Nasa has admits their pics are not the correct colour, before anyone starts to say im wrong. Some of you will have been aware of it for a long time, for others maybe you havent heard.
Heres a few pages you can see what i mean about the colour.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3418147.stm
http://mars-news.de/mars/viking.html
http://www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/mars-hiddencolors.htm
Some websites explore this more seriously than others but the fact remains. The key was the colours of the US flag, NASA logo and sundials in pics being purple or red. NASAs false colour images, released due to time constraints, have colour calibration tools (flag, emblem and sundial) which are used to recorrect colours. Its no secret, just not widely known.
2006-10-05
14:49:46
·
10 answers
·
asked by
m c
2
in
Society & Culture
➔ Mythology & Folklore
welltravelledguy> who says go and look at the pics, ive been looking at them, not continuosly, for around 30 years, since viking and NASA say that the colours are wrong. So you obviously havent researched it before you tried to put down this point.
To everyone, I dont need to hear about rgb values, digital cameras using more green than blue and red. Or about Dr Alders points, the guy from NASA, who says that the colour is wrong because they use more infra red.
Ive read that stuff.
2006-10-05
15:13:36 ·
update #1
I did not mention, my question is from the viewpoint of standing on Mars
2006-10-05
15:48:03 ·
update #2