If he (her husband) is the landlords agent, he has whatever authority she has bestowed upon him.
His authority does not go beyond the rights they have under state law.
2006-10-05 15:04:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by BoomChikkaBoom 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unless he has power of attorney in writing from his wife the answer then is no he has no authority in of the goings on between you and your landlord. In a nice way just ask him under what authority dose he have to inter fear with you and your landlord. You may want to contact the ex-husband and inform him of what has been going on also, Next inform your landlord of whats been happening and that you wish it to stop, also inform both the landlord and her new husband that if things don't change that you will be seeking the assistants of an attorney and will seek legal damages.
In any state a person may be an agent for a landlord but that would mean that they are in the employment of the landlord and that you could ask of your landord.
But under no means do you give any information to this guy until you know for sure who he really is and what type of power he carries for your landlord and keep any documantion/copies between you and the landlord.
GoodLuck
2006-10-05 14:27:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Don C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would think that if you have irreconsilable issues with the landlord's husband, you might first try contacting the wife (landlord)... and if worse comes to worse, the ex-husband (who might actually be very helpful).
Remember, though, that even *if* the current husband has no *legal* pull as far as your lease is concerned, he still has quite a bit of *personal* pull with your actual landlord. While he might not have the authority to command you to do certain things, he has the capability of making things very, very hard on you via his wife - your landlord. I would try to please him as much as possible until your lease is up. Contact the ex, a lawyer - whatever. If you are still having the issues when your lease comes due, find another place to live where the landlords will be less concerned with the little things.
2006-10-05 14:10:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by AeroMidwest82 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
When push comes to subpoena, your landlord is going to say that he's always had the authority to act as a manager.
You're not going to win just because he doesn't own the place, you're gonna have to do better than that.
2006-10-05 14:07:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by open4one 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your lanlord's husband acquired one fourth interest in the property when he married your landlord. It's a marital asset. That's why people get prenuptual agreements, because half of everything they own becomes the property of the new spouse.
In any event, if your landlord allows him to act as her agent, it is no different than if she had hired a property manager. If she allows him to make decisions on her behalf, it is just like she said it.
So shut up, pay your rent on time, keep those damn kids out of the hallways, and turn down that damn radio!
2006-10-05 14:06:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by normobrian 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Steven F is right....the landlord has the right to assign anyone as a representative of her business affairs. Chances are that her husband IS indeed also your landlord...ownership is not the same as landlordship. One is a deed and one is an occupation. It would be in your best interest to avoid the situations that provoke your landlord to the point that she assigns him to act on her behalf. Regardless of how he handles things, he is attempting to helping his wife.
2006-10-05 14:12:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by maynerdswife 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
some landlord are way out of whack, i assume we are conversing u . s . a ., there are a pair of issues to envision 1st: study the hire settlement that's the controlling authority on what the owner can and may be able to no longer ask of you, what does the hire say approximately muddle? now their could be a area situation if the region messy on what form of messy if food in each single place, that would carry approximately bugs, animals then despite if the hire does no longer handle it might desire to be considered as a wellbeing code violation in case you're conversing approximately muddle on the traces of packing packing containers in rooms, unpacking non-food products then no until the hire explicitly states no muddle, can they now state you're able to do x, they and you're sure by the 4 corners of the settlement, the owner after the fact can no longer upload new words until the hire is up As in the direction of figuring out to purchase yet another inspection ask the owner the place below the hire words does it state you could pay for yet another inpection if it does no longer state it you're no longer guaranteed to pay for it if the hire does no longer handle the two: muddle, figuring out to purchase 2d inspection, cleansing carpets durring tenancy, permit him circulate for evcition. 1st frequently eviction for different then non-value of lease require, be conscious to treatment could state the hire provision you're in violation of and supply you a metamorphosis to treatment, if the hire does no longer state it then no case yet whilst the owner strikes forward, you could take place on the courtroom date, failure to coach will carry approximately defeault judgment and you will loose the case even nonetheless on the advantages you could win sturdy luck
2016-12-26 10:47:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he doesn't and that would all come out in court if something ever arises. Just deal with her as much as you can and document everything in writing!
2006-10-05 14:02:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need to talk to you landlord and ask her if this man speaks on her behalf. If he does, then you may need to think about relocating.
2006-10-05 14:03:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
depends really on the landlord if she lets him be a control freak .balls in her court, how far will she let him push her
2006-10-05 14:32:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by rae 2
·
0⤊
0⤋