Fox Network has tried saying that Foley is a Democrat and many people caught on so that one won't work... There must be something we can do so that everyone will once again live in fear and back our war on terror, however inexpertly we choose to fight it (the war on terror...)!
2006-10-05 13:35:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"Yes! Ha ha ha ha, liberal! You trickily clad your sardonic remark in realism, but I am a wise, wise internet political analyst, and I have rebutted you!"
I had something else to say but that first guy just gave me a complete brain aneurysm: every single vessel in my brain went at once. I want it recorded in future history books that this is when America learned that a scandal shouldn't kill a political party, but a party that buries its head in the sand over a one-person scandal should kill itself.
2006-10-05 13:44:21 · answer #1 · answered by Em 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I've seen the images on websites trying to "show" Fox News tried to present Foley as a democrat. I highly suspect the image is doctored.
I've watched quite a bit of both CNN & FOX. If that image isn't doctored, it is a brief typo. I'm sure the newscaster was verbally refering to him as a republican at the same time & it was immediately corrected, because all I've seen on Fox was references to REPUBLICAN Foley.
And I have heard MANY, if not ALL of the commentors on Fox, not only condemning Foley, but also wanting an investigation in to who knew what & when. One conservative commentator last night said "If Hastert didn't know - he should have!"
Part of the confusion (again, IF the image is accurate) is that there is a democrat Tom Foley. IF someone made that kind of mistake, I sort of hope they'd get fired for it.
The only thing "fair & balanced" about FOX is that it provides balance by presenting the "right while CNN presents the "left." I watch both to get the whole picture.
2006-10-06 00:31:27 · answer #2 · answered by Smart Kat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One party shouldn't try for moral high ground over the other. They BOTH should strive for moral high ground because it is.
Judge a person for who he is other wise it is just "another" form of "Racism". Yes, I know I misappropriated the word. Think past it. How would you feel if others pigeon hole you for the actions of another. Would your actions be better if they were going to paint your what ever group?
2006-10-05 20:51:23 · answer #3 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah nice try...
Anything is a moral high ground when compared to a liberal platform.
How can a liberal talk about morals while their party condones abortion?
2006-10-05 20:45:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
a religious person gives up his ability to make real moral decisions
a religious person gives these decisions to the religion
2006-10-05 20:49:06 · answer #5 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why not attack a foreign power resulting in tens of thousands of casualties, after all, it worked the 1st time
2006-10-05 20:40:11 · answer #6 · answered by Nick F 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
BJs for everyone in the white house. That should do it. Its ok it isnt sex.
2006-10-05 20:51:30 · answer #7 · answered by sdh0407 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
enough Republican morals,, Americans are sick and tired and not going to take it anymore
2006-10-05 20:39:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nice try liberal. I hope you cry when you lose in november!
2006-10-05 20:37:44 · answer #9 · answered by Ah Ha 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋