I agree! Gore was rather obvious with his dissatisfaction of Bill Clinton. Did it help him or hurt him? That's anyone's guess! He at least walked away with his dignity, by not letting Clinton take credit or be involved with his run for the White House.
2006-10-05 13:12:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by briang731/ bvincent 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Al was a nobody before Clinton. Even though Clinton did a good job of publicizing Gore, he also messed up Florida for Gore. I don't like Gore, but if I were him I would separate myself from Clinton
2006-10-05 20:12:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by caballero5792 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Did he?
His FAILURE to distance himself from Bill in the 2000 election is why he lost that election.
All he had to do was say "you know, what he did was WRONG, and I told him it was WRONG" and he'd have won. Easily.
But, he was too much of a pansy about it, and didn't, and now he's reduced to publishing pseudo science just to get attention.
Ah well. No real loss. He was out of great ideas after inventing the Internet.
2006-10-05 20:16:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by open4one 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
It would have helped him when he was running for President .. but now he has come out on his own .. he is better off not being seen with Clinton .. those days are long gone. Good Luck! :)
2006-10-05 20:09:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by tysavage2001 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No it didn't help, because it was staged and phony, like the
eight years of the Clinton Administration
2006-10-05 20:21:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Algore can't distance himself far enough from Slick Willie!
2006-10-05 20:14:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bawney 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I agree, but Al hasn't done a very good job of making himself look good on his own either.
2006-10-05 20:09:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hurt. People got to see who he really was.
2006-10-05 20:23:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sucks for him either way, really.
2006-10-05 20:40:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ah Ha 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He lost didn't he.
2006-10-05 21:09:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by s. k 3
·
0⤊
0⤋