if a child brings a knife to school it is wrong but if it is a symbol of religion its ok im not racist or ignarant but i think the law should be the same for everyone if some relgions are allowed certen symbols how can the say a crusifix is not a symbol of christianty
2006-10-05 12:53:56 · 11 answers · asked by mango_ie 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
yes i am talking about sikhs my partner is one! but still dont think its fair! and excuse the spelling im dslexic
2006-10-05 13:03:25 · update #1
I assume you are talking about sikhs. in fact they are one of the most passive religions around. I'd rather be alone with a sikh man in full regalia, than with a muslim man in just his underwear.
2006-10-05 12:58:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A cross is definetly a symbol of christianity but its not a weapon so your question doesnt seem to go anywhere.But if they happened to sharpen one end into a shiv then no they shouldnt be allowed to have it. the U.S. supreme court says that children do have the right of free speech even at school and can wear or carry religious items in school.But they do use common sense you cant put a religious item on a shotgun and call it your bible
2006-10-05 13:01:10 · answer #2 · answered by lilmama 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why cant people that live here abide by our culture and laws its not hard i mean u give an inch they take a mile racism racism racism thats all you ever hear ,u say no you cant bring that knife into our school cos its dangerous oh but its part of my religion i have to have it with me do they fuk if they are told no they file a law suit and go to court over it and generally win its all double standards sick of these people being pandered to, schools are about education first,not having a knife around there neck isnt gonna make any difference i really wish we would make a stand against this stufff i rearly do.
2006-10-05 13:08:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course it should be the same. I embrace the multi-cultural society we all now live in and would just love it if all racism could be eradicated. However law is law and different countries have different laws,regimes & ways of doing things - i believe we should pick a place which suits us best and go there; not moan n gripe and protest trying to change somewhere to suit us. (and this applies to british people moving to other countries as much as to people from other countries moving here!)
2006-10-05 13:02:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it shouldn't be waived, but FYI the crucifix is a symbol of Catholicism the cross is a symbol of Christianity.
2006-10-05 13:03:20 · answer #5 · answered by Wendy M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ANY acts of violence whether or not religious in nature are not good. Personally, i think it is an act of violence to brainwash a child into believing one thing, and not teaching them about the whole picture. But that is just me.
2006-10-05 13:27:51 · answer #6 · answered by Vita 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Religion itself is a dangerous weapon
2006-10-05 12:58:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Making nuclear guns for finding out purpose will be banned yet continues to be in prepare at present. Its really faith that poses a probability. fanatics can make faith the basis difficulty truly than human welfare. non secular human beings could no longer be hostile to any faith to have a better non violent society. of direction it could be conceivable that nuclear guns can damage the earth at one shot, yet fanatics utilizing those guns will be worse. in spite of the indisputable fact that faith in its purest variety will be a thanks to salvation.
2016-11-26 19:58:07 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How come you know about Acts of Parliament but can't spell? Priorities.
2006-10-05 12:55:32 · answer #9 · answered by Harriet 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think religion should be used as an excuse for stupidity.
2006-10-05 13:01:05 · answer #10 · answered by nondescript 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋