2006-10-05 12:33:24 · 14 answers · asked by janetelaine_33 1 in Health ➔ Men's Health
No.
All circumcision involves is removing skin...
Think about this from a historical standpoint. Men are not born circumcised and circumcision has not been around forever. Thus, mankind would not have gotten very far if uncircumcised men could not get a woman pregnant.
2006-10-05 12:37:39 · answer #1 · answered by EMT Geoffrey 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would say absolutely not. The natural mans penis is naturally not circumcised god didn't put it there for birth control or we would stop having our boys circumcised. If you are trying to get pregnant I would go to an OB/GYN or a fertility clinic and have the man get a sperm count/
2006-10-05 19:36:33 · answer #2 · answered by Dalmatian 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
definitely 100% NO. i am one of 10 sibling and I know my father was not circumcised..
2006-10-05 20:06:44 · answer #3 · answered by glasgow girl 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if his foreskin is really tight; but even then, I wouldn't use that as a form of birth control....hehe
2006-10-07 00:29:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uh-uh, no connection there.
2006-10-05 19:37:03 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO. that is a retarded question. Just keep humping her.
2006-10-05 19:36:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. It's still a penis.
2006-10-05 19:38:28 · answer #7 · answered by badkitty1969 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, it doesn't affect the sperm count
2006-10-05 19:55:32 · answer #8 · answered by webby 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that has nothing to do with it.
2006-10-05 19:50:07 · answer #9 · answered by Jas 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
2006-10-05 20:00:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋