English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just set aside false philosophers and false scientists, I wish that the learned and accomplished evolutionists will please give a convincing answer about some following points:
When exactly was the occurrence of Big Bang?
Now physical matter has filled the whole universe, or there is still some emptiness out there? If the universe was filled with matter, where would go the energy from Big Bang?

2006-10-05 11:05:52 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

17 answers

The last time I checked, the only people quarrelling about evolution are members of the religious right. Evolution concerns biological organisms; the Big Bang concerns the origin of the universe and happened about 15 billion years ago (give or take a billion or two).
Most of the universe is empty, with lumps of matter scattered around it.

2006-10-05 14:36:00 · answer #1 · answered by The Doctor 7 · 3 0

Scientists don't argue about it. 99.999% of them accept it as the best explanation of the diversity of life on earth.

When exactly was the occurrence of Big Bang?
13.7 Billion years ago, +/- 0.2 billion years. Two guys just won the 2006 Nobel Prize for Physics for that one.

Now physical matter has filled the whole universe, or there is still some emptiness out there?
Lots and lots of emptiness.


If the universe was filled with matter, where would go the energy from Big Bang?
Into matter and motion. It takes quite a bit of energy to push a cluster of galaxies.

2006-10-05 16:40:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

When was the Big Bang?

Definitive Answer = Long, long ago.

Now physical matter has filled the Universe???

Definitive Answer = No. There is some matter in
the Universe, stars, Planets, Moons, Asteroids, Meteors, and miles and miles and miles of just plain nothing; like more nothing than you can possibly imagine.

Since the Universe is continuously expanding outward, there are no known boundaries to it. That means that as far as you and I are concerned, it goes on forever.

Where did the energy from the Big Bang go?

Definitive Answer = Outward from the explosion, and it is still moving outward because we have yet to see any waves of reflection coming back at us where it might have bounced off of some kind of end wall or block at the end of the Universe. So - however big you think the Universe is...hey, it is bigger than that..

Why do people keep arguing about this stuff?

Definitive Answer = Because they can.
And because uneducated people like to discuss it
as if they had some tiny, miniscule idea that was
important to our future generations.

To get a really good estimate of any speaker's knowledge on the subject of outer space and the "big bang" theory, etc., ask them the calculated distance from Earth to the most distant Star we have cataloged as of 2006. Next ask
them how that distance was calculated. 99.95 percent
of respondants will not have a clue. See? They speak from the basis of uninformed opinion. The value of what they say is not to much. When you find someone who can rattle off the statistics suggested above and name the distant Star, I would take note of what they say and chew on it for a while.

2006-10-05 11:29:09 · answer #3 · answered by zahbudar 6 · 2 0

Scientists are NOT quarelling about evolution at all. (I can't speak for philosophers ... they have different types of discussions.)

The *myth* that there is some disagreement among scientists is put forth by creationists. 95% of American scientists, and 99.8% of scientists from other countries agree that evolution is the best scientific explanation for the origins of species on this planet.

However, evolution has NOTHING to do with the big bang ... evolution only concerns life on earth ... not the origins of the universe.

The big bang theory of the origin of the universe does not has nearly as sound a footing as the Darwinian theory of evolution ... but it is still very strong, and still getting stronger. Some astronomers and cosmologists still debate the theory, but they are becoming more and more the minority.

2006-10-05 16:46:56 · answer #4 · answered by secretsauce 7 · 2 0

You have been misinformed. What you have to understand is that as time passes, the world moves into new times and new things, and the human understanding must constantly be renewed. God makes all things new!

Beginning about 300 years ago, the human ability to reason brought about the Enlightenment, and with it the scientific revolution. For most people, the Enlightenment brought intellectual freedom and an opportunity to draw closer to a rational grasp of the reality in which we are immersed.

THESE PEOPLE ARE THE WINNERS.

There remained and still remain, however, a minority of people who do not understand the meaning, the power, the godliness and the beauty of that rational understanding, but instead find it frightening. These people prefer to remain with their incorrect understanding that in the past there were people who had a correct understanding of things that came from supernatural sources. These people insist that their faulty understanding of the older magical sources is the real understanding, and that those who have accepted the rational way of approaching reality must be wrong because modern people disagree with what the leaders of these regressive thinkers want their followers to believe.

THESE PEOPLE ARE THE LOSERS.

The winners win and the losers lose for the simple reason that REALITY IS WHAT REALITY IS, AND NO ONE'S WISHES TO THE CONTRARY MATTER AT ALL.

Evolution is a well understood process. The evidence for evolution is overwhelming, and all the winners accept the notion of evolution. Only the losers refuse to accept it.

Here is a web site that is easy to understand that explains in simple terms why the notion of Evolution describes reality correctly.

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/

From this you will learn why the Godly, sane approach to reality is to accept the fact that Evolution explains part of the mystery of how God creates his creation, and why being afraid to accept the notion of Evolution is ungodly and based on irrational fears.

Please save your fear for fearing ("revering") God, and see if you can outgrow fearing reality. Leave the LOSERS behind, and become a WINNER. Relax, and let the Holy Spirit carry you into the real world.

2006-10-05 16:31:07 · answer #5 · answered by aviophage 7 · 2 0

The battle for and against evolution is fueled by politics, religion, and science. Scientists have determined that the earth is much older than popular religions believe, resulting in conflict.

The big bang occurred about 13.7 billion years ago, we know this because the radiation from the explosion has been traveling this long. The "stuff" left over from the big bang is everything you can see, it has cooled since the initial explosion.

We don't know what exists outside the observable universe, because we can't see that far (the light hasn't had enough time to reach us yet), but we do know it's there because of the shape of the universe that we can see. It's impossible to address the question of what lies beyond the universe scientifically (because we can't see further than the light has had time to travel), but it does make for good coffee conversation.

2006-10-05 15:32:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

First of all it's the "Theory" not law of evolution so unless it becomes a law (not likely) there will always be skeptics. The big bang is estimated at about 15 billion years ago. There will always be emptiness in the vacuum of space. Although there are some particles in the vacuum, it is mostly without matter. The energy from the big bang is what created the matter in the first place. And the only way to destroy that matter would come fromm the eventual collapse of the unvirse in the undeterminable future. The universe has it's edges but there is know accurate way of knowing how truly vast it is. Our minds cannot concieve how huge the universe is even if it were given to us in units of measure that we are familiar with.

2006-10-05 11:22:55 · answer #7 · answered by Mace 2 · 0 2

Evolution has nothing to do with the big bang. According to Newsweek, in 2002, 0.14% of scientists in the related fields of science, didn't believe in evolution. Where is the quarreling?

2006-10-09 04:12:52 · answer #8 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0 0

I think it is quite evident that creatures evolve. And indeed evolution is clear and evident.

"Natural Selection" is one of many things that are tied up with evolution. This is not quite clear. It is an assumption that creatures evolve due to the survival of the fittest. This is why the theory of evolution has room for attacks from people who say things like "intelligent design".

2006-10-05 11:18:58 · answer #9 · answered by tedhyu 5 · 0 0

EVOLUTION IS NOT CLEAR AND IS NOT STILL EVIDENT.

SCIENCE GOES ON AND GOES ON THROUGH AND
IS ALWAYS IN SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH.

Evolution for me is a mechanism for organic generation.

I do not believe in the Big Bang.
But I do believe that the universe "its containing"
can be classified such as matter and anti-matter.

I do not believe that world can continue as it has been doing
and gone this last century if people do not love one another
and think of the forgiveness and the love and the kindness
and the aimsgiving and the help of our neighbor
and to pray and to comply the ten commandments and
the most important thing, to love GOD.

I DO BELIEVE IN GOD AND THAT HE CREATED EVERYTHING.

The man parameterizes the processes and the systems
in order to study and make hypotheses and theories.
But beyond of this, we will never have to
forget about who says
I AM WHO I AM,
GOD.

Obviously until everybody sees the truth this quest will end.

2006-10-05 11:59:00 · answer #10 · answered by theWiseTechie 3 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers