this article demonstrates just how little backbone liberals have, and how they cry when someone says something they disagree with. how EASILY they are offended by little things.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,217953,00.html
Why do the democrats want to limit the freedom of speech, by getting offended and regretting the airing of someone who is only giving his opinion?
2006-10-05 11:04:17 · 15 answers · asked by kunta kinte 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That's just the way liberals are. They are not quite right.
But, if they aren't screaming and throwing a hissy-fit, they are fun to listen to.
2006-10-05 11:07:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
i'm no longer a geologist, yet, the time period of your attempt (ten seconds) is a few distance too short. attempt leaving the ice out for a pair hours and see if any of it melts. also, that's a shown actuality that Artic and Antartica ice is melting, that may be shown and has been measured. this isn't the position the talk over international warming is. there is absolute self assurance about no matter if the ice is melting. The questions/controversy pertains to no matter if the shape will opposite itself and no matter if people are the reason. ultimately, Al Gore got here out with an Inconvenient truth (about international Warming) in 2006 and it depending on the paintings of scientists that took observe of this lengthy earlier that. Benghazi got here about in 2012, so as a fashion to make your concern authentic, Al Gore might want to have had to foretell the destiny 6 years ahead. If he might want to truly anticipate the destiny 6 years ahead, we could continually have elected him President, and afterwords, made him an major adviser in our authorities (and an adviser to some thing of the international) for some thing of his existence.
2016-12-04 07:44:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course your little article is from Fox News, the Official PR Agency of the Republican Party. Where else would it be from?
For your information buddy, it's not us Democrats limiting free speech. It's your boy Alberto Gonzales (the Attorney General) running up to Capitol Hill every week demanding that Congress pass laws to allow wiretapping, eavesdropping without warrants, collect Internet search records etc.
Next time ask a question instead of posting a question mark at the end of some "statement".
2006-10-05 11:09:36 · answer #3 · answered by Ed A 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Oh so the liberals are "spineless and sensitive"???
How is this different from Cindy Sheehan? Both lost a son, both have their own outspoken viewpoints, and how did the right react to Cindy Sheehan?
By whiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiining incessantly!
And it's only liberals who whine when someone gives a different opinion?
HaH!
2006-10-05 11:22:56 · answer #4 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, who's insensitive? Do Bush and his motley crew have a corner on the 'sensitive' market? Never see any of them shed a tear over the kids and infants they blew to hell in Iraq. Watched that phony shed crocodile tears over stem cell research, killing them poor little embryos , right after he wanted to bomb the shlt out of Lebanon.
We're losing freedom of speech because of Dems..whoa..the Reps passed the so called Patriot Act which literally craps on our Bill Of Rights.
Sorry for being so insensitive, Mac.
2006-10-05 11:22:17 · answer #5 · answered by saltydog 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Judging by the liberal answers, the article hit the nail on the head. Couric and the libs here react to conservative views like vampires to sunlight.
2006-10-05 11:15:15 · answer #6 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I viewed the video, and read the article. Are you referring to Ms Couric using the word repugnant? How is what she said limiting Mr Rohrboughs freedom of speech? Did I miss something? She has her view, and he has his. That makes her spineless?
2006-10-05 11:24:58 · answer #7 · answered by notme 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I don't think any of us would disagree that murder is wrong esp. in the case of school shootings. If you think we disagree with that, your crazy. I didn't watch the TV show but read your link. Of course you know our general stance on abortion but I am sure you will find some Libs against as well as some cons for it. In general that's the way it seems to go. In my Op ion to equate Columbine with abortion is ludicrous. You want God in public school, you will have to include every god and no god..You'll have to cover every theism...Another ludicrous concept. Basically...Chill out man...If you want to go to war with us.... fine.....Other wise..Quit your whining
2006-10-05 11:23:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Fox News. figures.
I missed the part where the Dems fit in. An anecdotal reference doesn't mean all Dems, all Libs agree with the few mentioned, any more than a KKK rally means all Republicans turned out.
2006-10-05 11:10:06 · answer #9 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Read your article and I just don't see it, by the way that's a story run by fox new the most non demcratic entity on this planet--find a more creditable source and you won't have to get all excited over nothing.
2006-10-05 11:10:35 · answer #10 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Fox News ripping on Liberals?!? Who would have thought...
2006-10-05 11:51:30 · answer #11 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋