I was listening as a very conservative talk show host just down played it by using Clinton as his whipping post.
I am glad I am not obligated to anyone politically.
I am fairly moral, but if I had the choice of going after a cosensual female, and somebodies boy child, I would choose the of age female if she went for it too.
I don't have a boy, but I am the father of an eight year old girl.
I f anyone went after her, you won't read about him anywhere but the obituary column.
At least Clinton liked of age women.
I am not going to say that he was altogether right, but I am not going to hold a grudge against him either
2006-10-05 08:58:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by theodore r 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
At least Republicans won't re-elect the pervert. Shall we list the number of Democrat Pervs who have been elected again and again?
Frank? 1990 that he had hired and housed a prostitute -- who conducted business from Frank's living room.
Gerry Studds? refused to apologize for what he called a "consensual" relationship with a 17-year-old male page -- and was re-elected for five more terms.
And then there was the guy that Clinton gave a pardon to....for having sex with a 16 y/o campaign worker..... I can't recall this "paragon of virtues" name.....
Oh, and what about Bill? Screwed around, accused...multiple times, of harassment, and then LIED under oath.
Choke on your own before you go after the other parties pervs, at least HE WON'T RUN AGAIN!!!!
2006-10-05 08:57:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If Foley joins the Democrat Party, he will be an instant hero.
He can run for office and get elected in any Blue State.
Democrats love perverts.
2006-10-05 08:45:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Nope/// Both parties have sickoooooooooo
The same as Mel Reynolds is no hero of the Democrats
2006-10-05 08:45:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is Clinton still the Democrats hero?
Dirty Old Men
It think it is the same answer!
2006-10-05 09:24:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no such thing as heros
but he is a gay old pervert
2006-10-05 08:44:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Not-Uh-Fighter 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No just one in a long line of disgraces.
2006-10-05 08:43:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Skip F 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, the poster child.
2006-10-05 08:58:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by patblock1 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
it has nothing to do with republican or democrat, it has to do with the fact that he was gay.
what label serves you best?
2006-10-05 08:43:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Don't you think you're being a little silly?
2006-10-05 08:44:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sean 7
·
1⤊
0⤋