explain urself
i think it should b, just think about it...when u were young in school and ur teacher ask what u would like to b when u grow up...at least 77% of kids wants to b president but never will b
2006-10-05 08:37:17 · 11 answers · asked by Not-Uh-Fighter 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Maybe. The country is way bigger than the original 13 colonies. Perhaps a committee where one elected president represents each party. How about that idea? ;)
2006-10-05 13:37:42 · answer #1 · answered by Reba K 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think 1 President at a time is enough.
There are all sorts of checks and balances- Congress and the Supreme Court are good examples.
Besides, everyone thinks he/she knows how to run the country.
So, maybe we are all "Presidents" so-to-speak!
2006-10-05 08:45:32 · answer #2 · answered by Malika 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sounds like 5 human beings have the perfect answer , how are you going to provide 10 factors to each and all and sundry of them? seem up the again floor of LBJ, a crooked flesh presser if there ever develop into one! truly Kennedy did not like him yet needed him to get the southern vote! keep in mind Kennedy develop into the first Catholic President , and as a lot as that element anybody suggested, no Catholic might want to ever be President!
2016-12-04 07:38:18 · answer #3 · answered by harbert 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a reason we have a president instead of just a congress. Some decisions can't wait for a vote. If there were more than one President, every decision would require a vote.
2006-10-05 13:45:32 · answer #4 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because many people want to be president, we should allow more than one president at a time? Does that make sense?
No, there is a president with many advisors and checks and balances on his powers. It's perfect how it is.
2006-10-05 08:41:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
All it would do is cause conflict and give each of them someone else to shift the blame to....isn't there enough of that in the White House?
2006-10-05 08:45:05 · answer #6 · answered by mcnees79 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. What we need to do is scrap the two party system which has failed us and start a multiparty system like Briton has.
2006-10-05 08:46:23 · answer #7 · answered by S.A.M. Gunner 7212 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a mess that would be! Twice the conspiracies! Twice the scandals! No thank you. Leave it as it is.
2006-10-05 09:06:04 · answer #8 · answered by Mutt 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just think if we had two Bushes in office at the same time, It'd be twice as bad as it is now already!..........
2006-10-05 10:12:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should explain why you would ask such a stupid question.
2006-10-05 08:46:33 · answer #10 · answered by The dark side of life 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋