Why is that, why does it not work as a word, if you break the word down what is wrong with it? Victoriana is a similar word isnt it? Please shed some light here.
2006-10-05 08:21:04 · 7 answers · asked by frostbitten 3 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
First, "historia" is not a word that is used in English. It could be the Latin word for 'history'. If it were a real word, it would be the plural form for the Latin word "historium" --again, not a real word in either English, nor Latin. Therefore, no variations of the word "historia" can be possible.
Now, Victoriana is a different word. Victoriana (Victorian) refers to the arts, culture, and/or movements of the period of Queen Victoria of England (1819-1901)
2006-10-09 04:34:15 · answer #1 · answered by ca_christopher1965 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yah, you're right....
Prehistiria, You're just running out of time thats why instead of saying... Pre-historic story... You said " Prehistoria" in some other dialics story is storia...
or maybe you only mean the femenine version of pre-historians...
Good Day!!!
2006-10-11 11:31:16 · answer #2 · answered by BOBOYCARR 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"-Ana" is a suffix that forms collective nouns denoting an assembly of items.
So, thought it's not yet a word in the dictionary, it would be prehistoriana.
2006-10-05 08:30:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Historic is a proper word.
History is also a proper word.
Pre means Before.
prehistoria is NOT a real word.
prehistoric is.
2006-10-06 20:40:49 · answer #4 · answered by greyfoxx 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is a real word - in some other language!!! Spanish I think.
We add all sorts of foreign words to our sentences - so there's no reason why you can't add this one :-)
2006-10-05 08:57:56 · answer #5 · answered by Purple-Fusion 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's Prehistory / Prehistoric...just a gues..
2006-10-12 08:48:07 · answer #6 · answered by Adrian 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither is "Mysteria", can you believe that? It really should be!
2006-10-09 11:42:27 · answer #7 · answered by alfie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋