Umm well you can sample your own goods anytime since they are attached to your own body!
If you mean as in your MAN well try to stay away.
Sex is something that should be left in marriage. It's scientifically proven that when a man and woman go into each other the enzymes go into each each and become attached. That's why after you fool around you still have feelings for that person. That's why it's only meant for a man and woman in marriage. Essentually you become "one". Plus the STD's would be eliminated eventually.
God set laws into place for a reason. When you break them you risk the punishment of what comes into that territory.
Personally I enjoyed just dating girls and conversation. This time around I take my time meeting people. Even if I don't have sex for the rest of my life I want to wait until I'm married. Too much heart ache and agony. Yes I am a guy. One with class and morals. I may be shunned away from the "male" community for my thikning but I DON'T CARE! This is my life. The ones who are sluts male and female have deep emotional problems. Ask themselves if they are truley happy.
That's why sex gets boring when you sleep around. It becomes dull and people need toys and such.
2006-10-06 04:05:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Naddo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The State has no right to sanction any marriage between two individuals. The State's duty is to adjudicate the proper disposition of property in the event of death or incapacitation of one or both of the partners named in the contract. I don't know anybody who is still married because the State "sanctioned" their marriage. People who remain married do so because they love each other, work through the toil and trouble, and often consider their marriage to be a matter between them and their god. In other words, I couldn't care less about the issue. It's merely a legal arrangement, like filing a living trust. The God thing happens on the religious side, and that's none of the State's business whatsoever. Sanctioned and sanctify are from the same root word, and it's religious, not a legal construct.
2016-03-27 06:08:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well its hard to say. I waited into i was twenty because i really wanted to get married first. Now i wish i would have waited more. Now i always wonder how it would be with other people and i don't want to be promiscuous. Getting married now isn't as exciting to me as what i had all planed out in my head. However if you really love him and feel like its right. Just think about it, you know what's best for yourself. Hey you can always have him try on a speedo to check it out=) Contrary to what many people think it doesn't matter how long it is but the best is a mushroom head. Good luck.
2006-10-05 08:08:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by mermaid 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The reason you have been told to reject this before (by parents, clergy, etc...) is the same reason the commandments are almost ALL negative commandments. It's to protect you. Certainly the path of least resistance is to try it. But that is the easiest part of the relationship with another. The physical part will be there easily enough. The mental part of it comes a little harder, and with memories of having spent time with another it becomes even more difficult. The reason you don't want to, is the most selfish of all... FOR YOU!
2006-10-05 08:05:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by DS143 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought in marriage guys paid for everything.. does your boyfriend have a job? In that case you won't be paying for anything. So if by SAMPLE you mean having him buy roses / dogs / jewlery. Then go for it!!
God, i know my girl friend likes to sample marrige and i'm not even out of college yet. But there is nothing wrong with that!
2006-10-05 08:02:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by jeff j 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think of marriage as more of a "playing house" type game than a purchase. Really, with the tax incentives and all, it's kinda more like society bribes you to fit in with their culture. Not a purchase at all. But if it behooves you to sample, then sample away.
2006-10-05 07:56:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is he good to you? Is he a nice looking man? does he work hard?If you answered yes to these your saying you would walk away from a good man just because he's not good in bed. you talk about him like he's a piece of furniture.You sound very sallow. Well you could sit that one out and purchase you another,and another,and another. Than a good man wont wont your nasty a$$.
2006-10-05 08:11:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Witchy Woman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
WRONG attitude. You are not ready for marriage. It's not wrong to want to. But it is wrong to.
Your attitude is deffinately screwed up. Marriage is for a life time.
The whole idea is to adjust each life to one another.
Look at the Hindu's. All the marriages are pre-arranged. Sometimes before birth! They have a very LOW divorce rate.
2006-10-05 08:00:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jack G 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's nothing wrong with that. But if the guy's a Catholic, for example, then I believe that they operate a "money up-front" system, and they don't offer refunds.
2006-10-05 07:57:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by John P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well dear, i believe in No S** before the "I do." but in this modern time, its rare to see couples doing that. But if u really love somebody, then you should wait. True love waits...... and marriage is supposedly a" no return, no exchange" deal.
hope this helps!
2006-10-05 07:56:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by oryyyo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋