2006-10-05 07:32:03 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
No we moan about everything and forget how rich we are!
Zippy I love you! I laughed so much when Bungle Zipped you up!
2006-10-06 09:50:50 · answer #1 · answered by Nicola H 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is NO man, or man's organization (including socialist governments... if that is where you're going) rich or poor that is not tempted to corruption. This question is to great extent flawed, as WHERE wealth is centered and controlled is not so important as HOW much wealth that wealth re-produces fotr the benefit of humankind on God's great earth. The benefits of good stwardship may never make everyone's plight equal, but would you trade conditions of any time in the past for those we have now.... (BE CAREFUL ANSWERING)?
A mighty kings from other eras would consider the mode of our lifestyles even among some of the 'poor' today lush, extravigant and wondrous.
2006-10-05 07:46:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I’ve always had a problem with the accumulation of wealth, as it goes against everything I feel is right and good with the world. There is no denying that a few of us have been endowed with special gifts be it good looks, brains or incredible charisma. These types have a much better chance of being successful than an ugly, untalented, marginally intelligent person who trips on their own words. The hand they were dealt was not their fault, it was just luck, but I feel as decent human beings if we as blessed with these natural gifts we should share the monetary wealth with those that were not so fortunate.
2006-10-05 07:40:43 · answer #3 · answered by moviesguy37 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It has been shown that if you made it even it would quickly revert back to the same percentages because only 6% of the world's population knows how to handle wealth. What would a tribe in the middle of New Guinea do with wealth?
2006-10-05 07:37:04 · answer #4 · answered by Barkley Hound 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's beside the point. If you took all the wealth of the world and divided it equally, in six months, the one's that had it before will have it again. They just know how to get it. Most of us don't.
2006-10-05 07:35:52 · answer #5 · answered by Fellini S 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, why not? What is the problem? There as always been have and have not people.
I'm a capitalist and wish to make and keep my wealth. Not be forced to give it away so lazy people can breed more lazy people.
If they are sick or crippled...Yes, I will help.
2006-10-05 07:35:30 · answer #6 · answered by Eldude 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That can't be true.. and if it is - no, I don't think it's okay. I'm astonished. BUT I wouldn't be one to donate, call me a bad person.. I don't care.. if roles were switched I wouldn't expect people to donate charity to me. Infact it would make me feel guilty.
2006-10-05 07:33:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes this is a concern.
i will bring it up at the next meeting of the
tri-lateral commission.
2006-10-05 07:39:56 · answer #8 · answered by 987654321abc 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no but if it concerns you so much form a street gang and riot.
cause its obvious through the hells angels gangs are a part of life.
2006-10-05 07:33:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is what you call "corruption". Now thats not really right at all. Lord Jesus Come Soon.
2006-10-05 07:34:49 · answer #10 · answered by icyhott4urmind 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋