English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

F is for fighting
R is for red, ancestors blood, for money they shed.
E we elect them
E we reject them, in the land of the free and the home of the brave
D is for your dying
O your overture
M is for money, you know what that cures

This stands for freedom, it means nothing to me, as long as there's a ___________.

Fill in the blank. Originally Dave wrote PMRC in there, when the PMRC was on a holy crusade to censor Metal in the '80's. Now in this day and age we have other things, so fill in your answer.

2006-10-05 06:50:48 · 20 answers · asked by Sleazy P. Martini 1 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

George Bush

2006-10-05 07:00:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes, opressive laws would threaten or even take away freedom.

Terrorists and the resulting laws and limitations from that limit freedom.

News that amplifies the actions of a few weirdos, each and every day, calling it news, scaring people, etc, limits freedom.

2006-10-05 06:58:03 · answer #2 · answered by kurticus1024 7 · 2 0

Democrat Party

2006-10-05 06:53:38 · answer #3 · answered by kapute2 5 · 2 1

As long as theres a threat to my right to go where I want, do what I want (as long as it isn't hurting anybody else), read what I want, listen to what I want, believe what I want, think how I want, live where I want, love how I want, and die when and how I choose to.

This country was founded on the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And not just for those who agree with the majority.

2006-10-05 07:02:09 · answer #4 · answered by badkitty1969 7 · 1 0

Government imposing laws which violate the constitution in the name of protecting freedom, when in fact, it will take freedoms away.

The Fed government has gone to far into private lives, states rights, ruining the good name and reputation of the US and spending us into oblivion. These all threaten our freedom.

2006-10-05 07:01:21 · answer #5 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 1 1

A threat to freedom is an electronic voting machine that has proven to be vulnerable to hacking.

Why even vote if you don't trust the machine you are using?

Seems pointless, but I'll do it anyway just in case my vote might count.

2006-10-05 06:56:13 · answer #6 · answered by Derek D 2 · 1 1

Threat to Freedom--- We saw that on 9/11.

2006-10-05 06:54:22 · answer #7 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 2 1

Right to move around

2006-10-05 06:52:21 · answer #8 · answered by Me 6 · 3 0

B*tch named jen asking if women are the root of all evil in this world.

2006-10-05 06:59:24 · answer #9 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2 0

George W.

2006-10-05 06:53:34 · answer #10 · answered by danksprite420 6 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers