English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Man, OJ was as guilty as the day was long, man. ANd that wily ole Johnny Cochran(god rest his soul)pulled out the race card, as usual, and said Mark Furman lied about using the N word! And
the issue of Furman using the N word held more water than all
that DNA stuff they had on OJ's a s s! Just goes to show,
accusing white folk of usin' the N word can get anyone's a s s
free from a murder trial.
Now OJ's a s s is runnin' free, god knows where, but prob in southern california somewhere, and the cat is STILL gettin' in trouble by the police for road rage and he even put a gun to some guys head...........well, if he gets in hot water again, ain't no Johhnie
cochran around to bail his a s s out this time with that d a m n race card stuff!!!!!!!!

Whcih of y'all think OJ was guilty of cutting that ladies head off?
Is it just me, Mr. Johnson, or what?

2006-10-05 05:38:25 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

12 answers

wha????

2006-10-05 05:46:42 · answer #1 · answered by Ms Pepsi 3 · 0 0

I do believe that O.J is guilty. Did you know that since then he has several times been involved in domestic violence cases against his now girlfriend? Also, he recently almost OD"d on a combination of illicit street drugs? It was him, his girlfriend and another female friend. He announced to them that he thought he was dying, that he was scared, and that he hoped for forgiveness for killing Nicole and Ron, after admitting to the 2 ladies that he did, in fact "do it." Of course, he "did it." I was only a child at the time of this murder and I still remember watching the police chase him down the streets of L.A. in his Bronco. I thought even then, as I do now, "why would an innocent man, grieving because his wife was just murdered, run away from the cops in a high speed car chase, why won't he just stop,shouldn't he be to devastated to run?"

2006-10-05 13:02:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think OJ was guilty as well - but he was found innocent by a jury of his peers and is entitled to whatever he deserves for doing what he did - maybe he dies by having his throat slashed by some Columbian drug dealers.

At least the man who killed those Amish girls took his own life rather than have CNN analyze his latest jail meal for the next 18 months.

2006-10-05 12:47:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The police tried to frame a guilty man. I don't give a hoots butt about OJ. Think of all the black people that were lynched and no one was punished for their murder.

2006-10-05 23:13:23 · answer #4 · answered by smitty 7 · 0 0

of course he did it!!! but he played the system and won...but then he LOST the civil suit adn still dont have to pay her parents jack!!! OJ is a player!!
and it wasnt a high speed chase...it was a low speed chase...more likfe follow the leader if you ask me...
i dont think he actually did the killing...but he was most definatly involved in it...he probably had the real killer purposly leave a small glove there so he could say is didnt fit him

2006-10-05 13:12:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So very guitly... but like you say when that race card is played, everyone freaks out and forgets about the facts... It is really a shame, because if white people accuse black people of being racist, nobody cares.

2006-10-05 12:48:43 · answer #6 · answered by teapreacher 4 · 0 0

OJ is definitely guilty and will get his punishment some day.

2006-10-05 20:53:13 · answer #7 · answered by sunshine 6 · 0 0

No, it isn't just you, I thought he was guilty too. He now lives in Florida where he is still getting in trouble with rage!

2006-10-05 12:43:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes he is guilty and yes unfortunately he got away with it. But keep in mind he will get his due one way or the other I guarantee it.

2006-10-05 12:47:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think he is definitely guilty, however, there isn't enough evidence to prove it. And under our system, you're innocent until PROVEN guilty.

2006-10-05 13:16:39 · answer #10 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 0 0

i've read Dr. Henry Lee's "Cracking Cases" which he did the forensics work on this case. So as much as I hate to say it, he did NOT kill those two....i still think he was involved in it though

2006-10-05 12:47:26 · answer #11 · answered by wingsfan_83 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers