Of course not.. that was the stupidest thing they could have done!! They will regret it in the end.
2006-10-05 05:08:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let's just say that the team is now 4-0 and have proven to be successful on offense, particularly when needed. If anything, I'd be more concerned about defense and special teams, neither area of which James contributed to.
By the way, he doesn't seem to be the best rusher around now that he's with Arizona. Maybe he's not all that great... Maybe the offensive line for the Colts were just able to open up holes big enough for a slighly above-average RB to get through.
2006-10-05 11:42:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Stumpy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Has it really made a difference? Last time I checked the Colts are still 4-0 without him. Doesnt matter who they got Addai will come through itll just take some time. They arent missing him and I dont think they ever really will.
2006-10-05 12:29:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Travis S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO, a BIG mistake. James has led the league in rushing twice and was the backbone of the Colts ground game. When they got a lead they could grind it out with him. Who is going to take his place? Dominic Rhodes? That's doubtful. Rhodes' 6- year career rushing total is about one third of what James did in one year.
2006-10-05 11:24:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by kidd 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well they are still winning. Think it might hurt them the most come later in the season when the weather can get bad and playoff time though.
2006-10-05 14:18:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Time to open new doors - time to come in with the new, and go out with the old. Addai has promise, and they have other options. Give it time to work.
2006-10-05 11:24:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by gatesfam@swbell.net 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont think it was a bad choice.. they need to pay harrison,manning and wayne so they really couldnt afford him... they're offense is fine without him but if he was on the colts he would bedoing alot better than wut hes doin now on the cardinals. the colts need to worry about stopping the run more than how to run.
2006-10-05 11:17:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by fenwaynomar45 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It will come back to haunt them.
2006-10-05 17:11:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by smitty 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No but they had no choise, they did because of the lack of money.
2006-10-05 12:34:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
1⤋