http://drudgereport.com/flashmfa.htm
Please move along. Nothing to see here...
2006-10-05 03:17:04 · 3 answers · asked by rustyshackleford001 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Swaggs, the accuser you cite was 17 at the time. That's the same age as Studds' paramour. Why the difference in treatment?
2006-10-05 03:25:51 · update #1
I'm not defending a pedophile. I'm asking why Democrats do when it's one of their own.
2006-10-05 03:34:35 · update #2
go figure ha !!!
2006-10-05 03:20:43 · answer #1 · answered by aldo 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Really? Ever hear of Tyson Vivyan? You do now. And my guess is there's alot more like him out there. Nothing to see here? Hah, keep dreaming skippy.
You don't get it. It's like Nixon said, its not the crime that gets you caught, its the cover up. The GOP leaders knew about this and turned there heads. Thats despicalbe. And sorry 17 is still a minor. What Studds did was wrong. How does that have any bearing on what Foley and Hastert have done? Why are you defending a pedophile?
What bearing does that have on this investigation?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061005/ap_on_go_co/foley_georgia;_ylt=Apw_0vT5FcptN3xEq6LTjTGyFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--
2006-10-05 10:21:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Could be, but the thing is... there wasn't only ONE guy that was harassed sexually by Foley.
2006-10-05 11:09:50 · answer #3 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋