Can a physical therapist call a patient's doctor, attempt to diagnose him on her own, get a nurse to come in to cathiterize a patient and call his insurance to see if he is approved. Esspecially since the patient didn't give her any insurance info. That leads me to believe she got it from the doctor, can he give out that info to someone who isn't in his practice, isn't social services, and isn't another doctor? And can a physical therapist decide someone needs a cathiter without going through tests to see if they are retaining fluids or have any bladder or kidney infections?
2006-10-05 03:16:29 · 3 answers · asked by whiteasacorpse 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Surely a lawyer from the United States must know the United States privacy act and hipaa law. Someone like that.
2006-10-05 03:38:29 · update #1
I am sure that there are many attorneys that could answer your question. You should seek the advice of an attorney in your area.
2006-10-05 05:22:53 · answer #1 · answered by www.lvtrafficticketguy.com 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a working towards crook protection lawyer. My sincere opinion is that law enforcement officials understand the crook legislation, in so much facets, larger than so much non-crook attorneys. Police officials are peculiarly well at realizing what habits is chargeable -- I quite often have got to seek advice from my statute ebook, however an skilled officer may have the entire factors of a so much offenses in his jurisdiction on able do not forget. It's spectacular. The colossal disparity in crook talents among crook lawyers (prosecutors and protection lawyers) and law enforcement officials is with the legislation of crook approach (the legislation governing, for illustration, whilst and the way searches will also be made, whilst a confession is authorized, and many others.). Most officials are mindful of the primary circumstances, however the coaching of legislation tuition in decoding and synthesizing circumstances can pay off in a colossal means. Plus, attorneys deal daily with the program of those legislation. Thus, the judgment of a legal professional on those disorders is appreciably extra subtle (and correct) than that of so much law enforcement officials. That being mentioned, I've met a few very clever law enforcement officials who had an wonderful talents of procedural legislation as good (and in case you positioned them in a swimsuit and tie, I'd under no circumstances for a minute suspect that they were not a legal professional). They're fairly infrequent, regardless that.
2016-08-29 07:30:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course there are many lawyers and a lawyer is expected to be familiar with all laws of land!
2006-10-05 03:23:41 · answer #3 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋