English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

im not defending his actions but it seems odd that the IMs cant be authenticated and the democrats position on this is contrary to their past actions.

2006-10-05 02:36:35 · 11 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

LOL.... That's the best one yet ? You are kidding right? Do you think he would have resigned or at the very least he would have suggested that himself ? NO..He instead admits to being molested, by a pastor as a youth? Good luck on that one ...LOL

2006-10-05 02:40:42 · answer #1 · answered by hardartsystems 3 · 1 2

I think the fact that he resigned less than 24 hours after the story broke on ABC is a pretty good indication that the messages are legitimate.

Foley is largely irrelevant now. This is now about how the republican leadership responded or didn't respond to the situation.

2006-10-05 09:45:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

His lawyer says they are. He admitted guilt, he resigned.
Ya think?
All of this mess is contrary to what any normal person thinks.
For a whole mess of reasons.

2006-10-05 09:40:57 · answer #3 · answered by justa 7 · 3 0

The dems build cases on long shots...just like their presidential candidates

2006-10-05 10:03:29 · answer #4 · answered by smitty031 5 · 1 0

Except for the fact that he confessed and then resigned their is no proof at all.

2006-10-05 09:47:29 · answer #5 · answered by Georgi Girl 4 · 1 0

Yes. The words from his mouth should be proof enough since his attorney says he doesn't deny sending them.

2006-10-05 15:20:08 · answer #6 · answered by sylvia627 1 · 0 1

Who is saying the the IM's can't be authenticated?

2006-10-05 09:39:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

You're reaching for straws, but your ship is sinking go bash Clinton or some waste of your time.

2006-10-05 09:42:27 · answer #8 · answered by madjer21755 5 · 1 1

It seems a confirmation to this effect had come from the horse's mouth!

2006-10-05 09:40:38 · answer #9 · answered by Sami V 7 · 1 1

yeah,....he resigned! if ur not guilty,... why resign?...why not defend ur self? Also, why does he admit to being a molested gay alcoholic now?

2006-10-05 09:44:23 · answer #10 · answered by sabastian b 2 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers