NO - it was NOT okay. (that's ME talking)
I think Clinton thought it was OK because he has no moral compass and neither do any of the far left libs.
2006-10-05 02:33:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
6⤋
No! Pedophile's are getting to many breaks, they arrest them and then give them bail. I say bury them under the courthouse! New laws need to be passed, to keep them in jail. On the news, with this new congressmen, saying he's gay and was abused, no excuse as far as I am concerned and the only reason its coming out now because the media got hold of the story. This congressmen was caught over a year ago and its just now coming out! Power and money seem to get you a free pass in society!He says he's no a pedophile but in reality he is!
2006-10-05 02:40:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by KIM A 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. at the beginning so as to be pardoned you could first be convicted which has no longer took place yet. 2d of all why would you pardon this way of extraordinarily publicized criminal, Clinton's marketing campaign worker did no longer resign from the domicile over his crime.
2016-12-26 10:19:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by louder 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton-schminton.
If you don't like what happened when Clinton was in office, don't let it happen again! Get on top of your boys in Congress (start with Hastert), and make sure the ones who dropped the ball get off the field.
2006-10-05 02:36:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by missusjonz 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Okay where do you get your information from???? Exactly what pedophile congressman did he pardon?? You Don't do you??? You know why, because it never happened.
2006-10-05 02:35:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Georgi Girl 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
You didn't even give the name of the congressman. If you can't be bothered to do that then why should I talk your question seriously? Am I supposed to take your word for it? Am I supposed to trust you? Is this George Bush??
2006-10-05 02:37:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
He did not pardon a Pedophile.
2006-10-05 02:36:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Villain 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Funny, you forget to mention that he served 42 months of his sentence, which in this case puts him near parole anyway.
Do you ever do any research son?
2006-10-05 02:41:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He didn't pardon him, he just commuted his sentence so he wouldn't have to be in prison. I guess that's the point those above who are denying it are trying to make.
PS: His name was MEL REYNOLDS.
2006-10-05 02:39:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I assume you've given us all the information to make a reasoned decision here or just enough to get the responses you want.
Facts? link?
Sorry, I forgot your not interested in those kind of answers.
2006-10-05 02:35:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by madjer21755 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
damn it, you just want people to turn their backs on the democratic party now that the elections are coming right. Site your sourses before spewing lies.
2006-10-05 03:22:28
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋