2006-10-05 01:13:16 · 17 answers · asked by Dreams 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
cuz all lost with chokesslam so he didnt need to deliver tombstone
2006-10-05 02:58:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's completely ridiculous. The tombstone is rather on the safe side considering some of the other moves going on now-a-days. Plus there is the fact that Kane hasn't done a tombstone since like the year 2000 or a few times after that. I haven't seen an undertaker match in a while but I thought he still used it.
2006-10-05 22:55:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever move Kane and Undertaker do needs to be Okayed by both wrestlers. If it is done improperly there can be an Injury. Stone Cold and Owen Hart. The only ones big enought to do it is normally the Undertaker and Kane. And usually they have the choke slam so they dont have to do it. If a wrestler (usually an oldschool one) who works with the person often will allow Undertaker or Kane to do a Tombstone because they have the expierience and the power to pull it off and not injure someone
2006-10-05 12:36:36 · answer #3 · answered by Platlander 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Tombstone was listed as a rare-use move because of it's inherent risk of being botched and seriously injuring someone. They only use it for featured spots and not a regular finisher. There are lots of moves that are either limited-use or banned from WWE period because of the danger level. Look around on Wiki or Google for some lists of the most dangerous moves ever.
2006-10-05 13:29:02 · answer #4 · answered by Special nobody 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tombstone is a very powerfull finisher, It can injure someone real bad or in somecases can even kill. So taker and Kane use it rarely.
2006-10-05 10:04:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
like some people have said, a piledriver is banned for the most part in the WWE (like a lot of moves) since people aren't skilled enough to do it safely anymore. it used to be more common back in the day when people apparently trained more and took better care of their opponents. despite the ban though, undertaker and kane are allowed to use it in some instances for shock effect.
2006-10-05 20:02:57 · answer #6 · answered by ksneo627 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
overall a pildriver is banned in the wwe,as quoted by micheal cole in the hardcore match between chris beniot and randy orton while on smackdown.a tombstone piledriver is however much safer as you know were to put your opponent.kane and the undertaker have been doing it for a while so i guess it's a kind of privilege to them as its a trademark for the both of them.
2006-10-05 11:48:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He tried to do it to Johnny Nitro recently but couldnt, cos Umaga came in. Its probably rare these days to see a atombstone, regardless of whether Undertaker or Kane uses it
2006-10-05 09:11:09 · answer #8 · answered by The Deadman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The move has been kinda banned being that the wrestlers neck is in an awkward position, Undertaker uses it on special occasions but it is onlt aloud to be used by him these days
2006-10-05 08:15:17 · answer #9 · answered by Double A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no specific reason as to why he's not doing it.
He's helping people get a good "push" and is not focusing on his career as much as he used to be yet I believe he'll retire from the WWE regardless.
I'm sure he'd prefer to be home with the wife and kiddies instead though.
2006-10-05 10:37:53 · answer #10 · answered by c0171♥ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋