Do you think that peeps who diss the President should get 15 years in the slammer?

Answer 1

I'm not quite sure what you mean by peeps and diss as I'm not familiar with many terms used those younger than myself. I thought diss was to leave at a party or something, but I'm now confused.

If diss means to speak against him in a non threatening manor, the "peeps" should get nothing due to freedom of speech.

If diss means to threaten, they should get at least 15 years.

If diss means to harm in any physical way, they should get life in the slammer.

Answer 2

Oh, Little Mark. I guess you don't know about the 1st amendment of the Constitution. And the fact that part of the workings of this government includes Checks and Balances which not only give us the right and privilege to question the President but also the responsibility of doing such. Once people stop questioning the President he is no longer a president, but a dictator, and this is no long a democracy but a dictatorship.

*************

LMAO!! I almost took lmn78744 seriously for a minute there!!!

Answer 3

Age is extremely better of a legality component. some thirteen 12 months olds are extremely mature for there age ( bodily and mentally) the biggest component will be to no longer take any style of income over her and such issues as that, in spite of the indisputable fact that you've conventional her for a at the same time as so i assume both of you get alongside and understand one yet another distinctly properly. only make confident she's on an same web page with each little thing you do because in court , her note is significantly better effective than yours. Douces

Answer 4

No. But, I think the President should get 15 years in the slammer.

Answer 5

Heck no, we are allowed to diss the president under the first admentment of the constitution of the united states of america. It is our freedom of speech, however we are not allowed to threaten or harm him in any way, and who would want to, he's out of there in two years and I'm for one will be happy to see him leave.

Answer 6

George Bush should get 15 years in prison for crimes against the Constitution of The United States.

Answer 7

a) the prez ain't royalty, what is this question here?

b) I assume you mean the prez of the US of A, so they shouldn't be bothered about it because
1) First amendment makes dissing elected officials protected speech.
2) When somebody is as eminently dissable as bush (or my own chirac for that matter), it's NOT dissing him, unless you have a vested interest in his government decision (as Haliburton stockholders do), that should be regarded as a felony.

Answer 8

It's called Freedom Of Speech and it's in the constitution...oh yeah, that's right...this president thinks it's just a g*ddamn piece of paper! (his words, not mine). He should get 15 + years in the slammer!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 9

Absolutely!!!
Anyone who shows disloyalty to our nation's leader is a Traitor and should be treated as such!
People who disagree with the administration are obviously anti-American and are giving aide and comfort to our enemies. It's high time we instituted a loyalty oath to the president as part of our military induction. Eventually, hopefully we can get the same in our schools.

Prison for political dissidents!
Loyalty oaths to individual leaders and parties instead of the constitution!
State controlled religion!
Censor 'Anti-American' speech and literature!

Oh, wait...silly me, I forgot this is America, not North Korea...never mind, my bad :p

Answer 10

The people who suggest that people should be locked up in jail for expressing thier views needs to get off thier high horse and realize thier are no better than anyone else.

Plus if that was the law it would remember me of USSR