well they have to build a nuke to keep thier national product viable
of course what I am speaking of is the threat to SK.
They have to up the ante to stay viable.
I'll wager that:
We take a passive aggressive stance for now...as it has been for nearly what 60years?
They got away with shooting the dummy rockets.
It has to stop somewhere. Someone has to put thier foot down.
Such a pain in the *** NK. What a waste.
2006-10-04 22:06:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by jorluke 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
What should be down? Half their population is Staving?
Seriously... well more seriously than taking the P out of your typing/spelling...
Maybe they'll blow 'emselves up while they're doing it by forgetting the words of the Fireworks Code and going back to the nuclear warhead after lighting the blue touch paper... BANG! Bye bye.
Remember Kids - enriched uranium isn't a toy, always go to a nuclear test organised by a recognised world superpower... France for example, and they always test theirs in such pretty places too!
2006-10-04 22:07:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Danno 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I'd love to bomb them into the stone age ... oh wait, their own leader has already taken them there. The dictator there really is a tyrant and the people suffer a lot. At this point in time though there's not a lot the US can do. Although, I read that the new Japanese leader has mentioned a pre-emptive strike. We should let the Japanese know if they want to do something, they have our blessing.
2006-10-04 22:03:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Like all countries, they have pride and want to strut their stuff. China will knock them down if they play hardball in that area. After all, in 20 years time, China and India will be the economic giants of the world and USA will be hard pressed to match them.
Answer is to do nothing - what can be done? Another invasion? - remember vietnam and look at the crap happening in Iraq etc.
2006-10-04 22:08:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I easily wish no longer. i wish that saner extra rational minds in that component to the international will be in a position to persuade North Korea to relax their jets. this isn't a interest! have relaxing yet be threat-free!
2016-12-04 07:13:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if 7 other countries can, why can't they? the U.S. is hypocritical, because it is the only country to ever use the bomb against another country, and kill hundreds of thousands of people. Yet we have the audacity to piss and moan when another country wants one?
On the other hand, the prez over there is starving his people, just to spend the money on upgrading the military, instead of food. Of course, the BOMB is his number one cause. North Korea is a country we SHOULD have gone to war against, but we didn't. why? NO OIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We have no interests there.
Why aren't we, the world's only superpower, finding ways to get rid of the nukes we have, instead of keeping and building more, while bitching about another country that wants one? Like i said, we are hypocrites!!!!!!!
2006-10-04 22:07:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by snafu1 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Of all the countries in the world that have Nuclear capablilty (I can think of atleast 6)including Israel who has been at "war" more times then you can shake a stick at, only the US has every fired a weapon in the history of man kind. If the US can have these weaposn, why shouldnt anyone else.
2006-10-04 22:08:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Cherry_Blossom 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
They are really only a fly on the elephants ars*!
2006-10-04 22:01:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
sidle a couple a cruise platform subs up next to and bomb an aspirin factory.....
2006-10-04 22:17:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
LET THEM DO THE TEST THEN LET THE CHINESE INVADE AS THEY ARE A RISK TO CHINESE SECURITY
2006-10-04 22:44:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by joseph m 4
·
1⤊
1⤋