Science is Theoretical, Experimental, and Factual
2006-10-04 21:31:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by gnomus12 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
An ideology is an organized collection of ideas and I suspect that some scientists would like science to be properly organised. I have no idea what you mean by neutral in this context.
2006-10-05 04:34:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, the standard and absolute answer to this is neutral. Science is a method, it has no moral or ideological position of any sort, ever, period.
HOWEVER, scientists are human beings and allow ideology into their work even subconsciously.
So. make sure you are talking about science, not scientists. adphllps answer is bang on the correct line.
2006-10-05 05:54:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by andyoptic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science has no ideology.
It descibes the universe and puts those priciples to work.
Now scientists may disagree on the outcomes or hypothesis, but true science has no "ideology".
In fact, this is one of the distigushing traits between true science and psuedo-science. Psuedo-science often starts with a perceved idea (for example,"God created the universe") and tres to work to prove it. True science has no "goal" it either proves or disproves a claim.
2006-10-05 04:37:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by adphllps 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good science is neutral, but as with other fields people often manipulate things to suit their agendas.
2006-10-05 04:34:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Benjamin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
little both
it is part ideological because you base stuff on laws and theories that people have come up with before.
Other things require people to be very neutral and open to new ideas.
2006-10-05 04:32:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by RichUnclePennybags 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
inventive
2006-10-05 05:51:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋