True democracy is where people will chose who will contest the election. No indirect representation. All the powers must be with people.
2006-10-09 18:44:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by King of the Net 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
This is clearly a quote, and probably by a judge. You should have said who.
To me "true democracy" is an attempt to say "democracy," recognizing that the word has been misused so much that the term "true" needs to be added. Still, democracy is in fact tyranny of the majority. In a "true democracy" everyone would vote on everything, and all the people would have to go along with the result of the vote. So there would be uniformity, enforced uniformity, and it would be horrible.
The US is a republic, not a democracy. We vote on representatives to do the dirty work of making laws. (Laws and sausages; two things it's better not to watch being made.)
A great many things are brought up for a vote that ought to be the private decision of each individual. Too many things are legislated about that are not the business of government. Liberty is what we need, not real democracy.
2006-10-04 21:21:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by auntb93again 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have a Republic but use the term democracy is used because it sounds good. That is why the majority rules. There has never been, nor will there ever be a true democracy, to many different ideas, but rest assured we are still the most attractive country in the world to those who don't live in Republics.
By the way, the term sound minded has yet to be defined, even my the courts, that is why ballots are written in 142 different languages in the United States.
2006-10-04 23:12:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by John H B 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
True democracy has always meant rule by a majority of the populace, while maintaining the rights of the minority. This can be by direct methods (Athenian democracy, one person, one vote) or representative means (parliments and congresses).
Each voter will pursue his own interests.
True, American democracy has been overrun with gerrymandering (the rate that incumbents get re-elected is around 97%) and special interest campaign funding (another term is "legalized bribery"), but the focus should be on changing the laws and representatives, not morals.
2006-10-04 21:23:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by adphllps 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep, I agree with much of it... I would like to think of democracy as the rule by the PEOPLE rather than rule by a majority !
Terminologically, I would like to replace "principled political system" with the term "democratic culture" or "Legal culture"
Regarding Judiciary, I would like the Judges to stick to the laws and to uniformly apply them. If we wish them to be more effective we must give them more effective laws (It is the job of the legislature)
2006-10-04 22:33:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Olga 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
True Democracy is a government "off" the people, "far" the people and "buy" the people; instead of earlier of the people, for the people and by the people.
2006-10-05 01:06:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Seagull 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It used to be people elected by the people for the people, however, political parties hijacked this and we now have our representatives not representing us but party politics.
2006-10-04 21:57:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by graeme1944 5
·
0⤊
0⤋