2006-10-04
20:40:50
·
9 answers
·
asked by
pat800
1
in
Social Science
➔ Psychology
Let me add: I couldn't possibly be aroused to members of the opposite sex, try hard as I may.
2006-10-04
20:46:01 ·
update #1
Well, I think we're slipping into idealism here. After all, the question isn't about love, it's about sex. I could fall in love with someone from the opposite sex, yes, but physiologically I'd fail to display the slightest bit of arousal to even the most attractive member of the opposite sex. I realize sexuality is on a gradient scale, and in this sense I might be represented as exclusively homosexual; the issue, it seems, is not a matter of choice at all, but the organization of a neural system designed by heritable traits that work in combination with a particular set of developmental experiences, such as differential levels of prenatal androgens, and so on. Look at that, I've answered my own question!
2006-10-04
20:51:50 ·
update #2
"Natural" has nothing to do with morality. It's natural to have stinky breath, but this doesn't make it right. Interesting how sexual orientation, which in principle is like any biological trait, gets tangled up in the morality web.
2006-10-04
21:12:49 ·
update #3
Right, so on that note you'd want to have killed (as in eliminated from the human genome) people such as Wittgenstein, Sarah Bernhardt, Jean Genet, Lord Byron, and Michelangelo. Right, right, good reasoning there buddy.
2006-10-04
21:23:35 ·
update #4