you, but your whole family?
2006-10-04 19:44:26 · 5 answers · asked by gee-geeofmo 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
I wouldn't go for 50 years because all our fuels and things would probably just be running out! I'd rather wait until any friends were long long gone and go way into the future in the hope that the world would be a more efficient, cleaner happier place. It's unlikely it would be but they could always refreeze me! (Although it doesn't work for chicken does it?!)
2006-10-04 19:47:37 · answer #1 · answered by claire 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right now? Hell no! I've got life to live and boyfriends to screw. And what's the point of being frozen now and being thawed out in fifty years? I'd still be living then, as a 67-year-old lady. Maybe at the age of 50 or something I might try that so I can see what it's like in the new century.
2006-10-05 02:50:52 · answer #2 · answered by JJ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! I still have many things to do in life and I have to get them through. I would rather do whatever I can do within my capacities in our time now. Freezing yourself is killing yourself. Let's say we are trying to be fictional in here but nevertheless what benefit I would get fom being frozen for 50 years. To my disadvantage I will be quite a stranger to our place on such period being a sort of disoriented to many aspects..Hey, sounds like "Mel Gibson's movie"!
2006-10-05 03:22:26 · answer #3 · answered by ♥ lani s 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't want to be thawed out. I'd prefer to get sold as a popsicle from an ice cream truck to some child.
2006-10-05 02:52:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i too would say no to this... i don't want to start my life over again and to top that off who know's what earth changing events could happen. we could even be in another ice age at that time. that or be enslaved by aliens.. bleh
2006-10-05 02:55:40 · answer #5 · answered by War Mage Orange 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋