producer is the one who pays for it, and the director is the artistic mind behind the direction of the movie.....
2006-10-04 19:17:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Generally, a director controls a film's artistic and dramatic aspects, and visualizes the script while guiding the technical crew and actors in the fulfillment of that vision. It is the director's sense of drama, along with the creative visualization of the script, that transforms a screenplay into a well-made motion picture.
However, the director doesn't always have absolute artistic control. The director is usually selected by the producer, whose job it is to make the decisions that are in the best interests of the production company or studio or network. As such, the producers have veto power over everything from the script itself to the final cut of the film, often in anywhere from slight to extreme opposition to the director's vision.
A producer creates the conditions for making movies. The producer initiates, coordinates, supervises and controls matters such as raising funding, hiring key personnel, and arranging for distributors. The producer is involved throughout all phases of the filmmaking process from development to completion of a project.
2006-10-05 09:35:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cynical Idealist 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Producer:
The chief of staff of a movie production in all matters save the creative efforts of the director, who is head of the line. A producer is responsible for raising funding, hiring key personnel, and arranging for distributors.
Director:
The principal creative artist on a movie set. A director is usually (but not always) the driving artistic source behind the filming process, and communicates to actors the way that he/she would like a particular scene played. A director's duties might also include casting, script editing, shot selection, shot composition, and editing. Typically, a director has complete artistic control over all aspects of the movie, but it is not uncommon for the director to be bound by agreements with either a producer or a studio. In some large productions, a director will delegate less important scenes to a second unit.
2006-10-05 02:21:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Movie directors of course direct the artist what to do. While producers finances the whole movie. Producers can also be a director and can also a lead star and vice versa.
2006-10-05 02:23:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sir Torex 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The producer invests the money and the director put actors and technicians to work in order to shoot the movie scene by scene. Afterwards, he oversees the editing of the movie which provides the final product.
2006-10-05 02:21:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by zeca do trombone 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I've alwayz wondered that myself... The director is the one who says who does what & when. He's the one who's in charge, the boss & has no prob w/ telling peeps what to do :P Guess you gotta be like that to be a director. Producers... hmmm I'm guessing that they're the ones who thought of the ideas for the movie. Maybe writers...
2006-10-05 02:19:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
a director tells everyone what to do, a producer just pays and may have some influence in things depending, a director producer does it all
2006-10-05 02:17:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Wylde Woman 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
producer is the one who budgets the films while the director is the one who "directs" how the movie..
2006-10-05 02:24:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by kAyXeE 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The producer pays and the director decides about the shooting...
2006-10-05 02:23:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vette 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
producer finance the movie while director is in charge of everything of the movie as direction, what how when where,etc
2006-10-05 02:18:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by faisal k 2
·
1⤊
1⤋