I saw that covered on both MSNBC and CNN earlier this evening..
If it was an innocent mistake, it's pretty hard to believe.. Then again, I guess that's how Fox News got the nickname of "Faux" News?
Personally.. I never watch the channel. But I did see that report on other channels as well as a lot of news reports on the net.
Crazy!
~ ~ ~ ~
2006-10-04 18:50:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by HockeyGirl 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
No I don't agree that Fox tries to deceive the public.
I think they are fair in their reporting.
They are defenitely thinking type people they do not present news on an emotional roller coaster.
They also have reporters from both ends of the pendelum sitting in on interviews if they were biased this would not be happening.
Most of the other news stations I watch do not present in this way.
It is balanced not one sided.
A good day to all!
2006-10-05 02:04:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Absolutely! That damn neocon station has always had a direct line to the white house and they lie daily for the administration. Why do you suppose the white house picked Tony snow job(of faux news) to be the prez's spokeman?
2006-10-05 01:57:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by liberalthinktank 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's just nothing but another screw-up by Faux News Channel!
2006-10-05 02:19:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by brian 2010 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
come on. they named bush president way before it was official and way before the votes finished being counted, look at what they tryied to do to clinton they tryied to make im sound like he had lost his mind just because ha had the balls the tell the truth fox is not even trying to hide their intentions any more
2006-10-05 01:57:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by mexika_thug 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
FOX is pro republican.
FOX isn't that good at news; I think of them as the gerry springer of the news industry.
2006-10-05 01:51:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
isn't that just hilarious. Was that a report on him checking himself into a clinic for the treatment of alcoholism? As if alcohol makes you a child molester???? Who would have thunk it ;-)
2006-10-05 01:49:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Patricia d 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Simple mistake...EVERYONE is well aware of Rep. Foley's politcal orientation (no pun intended).
2006-10-05 01:47:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by PETER 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Of course it was done on purpose.
2006-10-05 01:53:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes, let's assume it is a conspiricy and not a TYPO....that is rational and not politically motovated bull....
2006-10-05 01:47:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by The Nag 5
·
1⤊
3⤋