English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-04 18:22:59 · 14 answers · asked by cnfrankl 2 in Politics & Government Elections

14 answers

You people are really sad, especially the women.

2006-10-06 04:36:53 · answer #1 · answered by smitty 7 · 0 0

Why? What does anyone think she has done, other than be a carpet-bagger moving into New York in order to get into Congress. Shame on New Yorkers for voting for her in the first place--she doesn't represent them, and was not a New Yorker. She just won a popularity contest.
She has no real accomplishments in Congress, but gets a lot of press because of her popularity with them. Good publicist also. I believe a lot of her press coverage is generated by the Republicn leadership, with the hope that she will be the democratic candidate. If she is, the Republicans are assured victory in 2008 with about anyone they want to run. Clinton's views are far left of the pulse of the nation and is not electable. Recent polls in Iowa shocked the press, becuase instead of the expected selection of Clinton for the candidate of choice in 2008, Iowans chose John Edwards, a much more moderate candidate, more personable, and has a strong anti-poverty agenda. Haven't heard anything more about that, and still Clinton is the press's darling.

2006-10-05 14:47:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

She's too far left. Just like I don't think Bush is the best because he's too far right.

I think we need someone more toward the center, leaning slight right or left. With all the bashing going on with both sides, nothing is getting done. If we had someone more in the middle, I feel there would be less bashing and more can actually get accomplished.

2006-10-04 22:38:35 · answer #3 · answered by Mutt 7 · 0 2

Because she is too stuborn on some things, and will always have the rep to "ignore" other things. I'd love someone closer to Clinton in the white house and would LOVE a woman, but not her. I'm pretty sure shes a souless vampire. True.... I have never actually seen her paint herself in kittens blood and dance around a fire naked, but I also have never seen the Pacific Ocean and am pretty sure thats real.

2006-10-04 18:34:54 · answer #4 · answered by Ripley 1 · 1 2

Because the only reason why people would vote for her is because they would want to see a woman as president.
They also did it with Arnold in California. They tought it was cool to have a Movie Star as governor, well guess what that is all what they got. A Movie Star, not someone who understands politics.

2006-10-05 00:24:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

authentic Gov Spitzer resigned and Clinton stayed on, yet that makes Clinton smarter, no longer Spitzer. Spitzer lost funds, his pastime and when you consider that he did not stay and wrestle the costs. yet he realistically might want to no longer wrestle them

2016-11-26 03:29:27 · answer #6 · answered by gardy 4 · 0 0

I cant answer this. I think she will be a terrific president. She will solve the health care and education crisis that we have been dealing with for a long time.

2006-10-05 06:01:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because she's a criminal. The only First Lady in the jistory of the USA to have been under criminal indictment.

2006-10-04 23:58:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

First of all, it is MRS. Clinton. Secondly, I prefer not to vote in people who we KNOW are lying, theiving, conniving, dick-whipped, and communist.

2006-10-05 04:28:16 · answer #9 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 0 2

i'd have no problem with her. unfortunately she brings a lot of baggage. a lot of baggage that a great majority of people are not going to forget. they equate her with her husband.

2006-10-04 18:32:03 · answer #10 · answered by k 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers